Trade Law Daily is a service of Warren Communications News.
Subscriber Login

Harmonized Tariff Schedule

The Harmonized Tariff Schedule (HTS) provide classification provisions and duty rates for almost every item that exists. It is a system of classifying and taxing all goods imported into the United States. The HTS is based on the international Harmonized System, which is a global standard for naming and describing trade products, and consists of a hierarchical structure that assigns a specific code and rate to each type of merchandise for duty, quota, and statistical purposes. The HTS was made effective on January 1, 1989, replacing the former Tariff Schedules of the United States. It is maintained by the U.S. International Trade Commission, but CBP is responsible for interpreting and enforcing the HTS. 

to
articlessource documents
Refine Topic Search
Clear Terms

Search Primer

Term list: Separate terms with spaces, not commas or semicolons.

Multi-word term: Place inside quotes to ensure an exact match (e.g. "surrogate value").

Acronyms: Use all capital letters to ensure the search is not looking for that letter sequence instead. (e.g., CIT).

Required term: If a term must be included in any resulting articles, prefix it with a plus sign (e.g., CBP +ruling).

Excluded term: If a term should be excluded from any articles being found, prefix it with a minus sign (e.g., ruling -NY).

Simplest form: Use the simplest form of a term (e.g. "russian export control" instead of "russian export controls") or "entity list" instead of "entity listing" or "entity listed").

Trade Court Upholds CBP's Classification of Steel Conduits, Defines Term 'Insulating'
March 15, 2023 by Jacob Kopnick|Top News

CBP properly classified Shamrock Building Materials' steel conduit tubing imports from Mexico as steel tubing and not insulated fittings, the Court of International Trade ruled March 13. Judge Timothy Stanceu said the "uncontested facts" show the tubing is not insulated and is therefore subject to 25% Section 232 steel tariffs.

Topics:Court of International Trade activity, Tariff classification rulings, Country of origin cases, CBP CROSS Rulings
CIT Upholds CBP's Classification of Carbon Steel Tubing
March 13, 2023 |Bulletin

The Court of International Trade ruled March 13 that CBP properly classified as steel tubing, not insulating fittings, the carbon steel tubing lined with epoxy coating imported by Shamrock Building Materials. Judge Timothy Stanceu said the "uncontested facts show" that the subject merchandise is not, as Shamrock claimed, insulating material under the Harmonized Tariff Schedule heading 8547 per the meaning of that term as used in the heading's description.

Topics:Court of International Trade activity, Tariff classification rulings, Country of origin cases, CBP CROSS Rulings
Human Interface Controller Importer Seeks to Suspend Action Under Test Case at CIT
March 10, 2023 by Ben Perkins|Litigation

A Court of International Trade case concerning the classification of human interface controllers should be suspended under a test case, German multinational technology company Robert Bosch argued in a March 8 motion. The request followed a March 1 test case designation by CIT Judge Timothy Stanceu. Both cases involve the same classification issue and the same material facts, Bosch argued. Separate litigation of each case would raise the possibility of separate judgments, which could yield "very problematic" results, Bosch said (Robert Bosch v. U.S., CIT # 20-00028, # 20-00030).

Topics:Court of International Trade activity
AD Respondent Tells CAFC It Was Not Required to Exhaust Claims Over Surrogate Values at Commerce
March 10, 2023 by Jacob Kopnick|Top News

Plaintiff-appellants led by Carbon Activated Tianjin were not required to exhaust their arguments against the use of Malaysian import data under Harmonized System subheading 2708.10 to calculate a surrogate value for coal tar because Commerce used data from the subheading for the first time in the antidumping duty review's final results, counsel for Carbon Activated told the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit during March 7 oral arguments (Carbon Activated Tianjin Co. v. United States, Fed. Cir. # 22-1298).

Topics:Court of International Trade activity, Court of Federal Appeals Trade activity