CBP recently asked Commerce for a scope ruling in an Enforce and Protect Act investigation involving whether imports of rough fittings originated in China and processed in Vietnam prior are evading the antidumping duty order on carbon steel butt-weld pipe fittings from China (A-570-814), according to a recently released Sept. 6 notice.
The following lawsuits were recently filed at the Court of International Trade:
The Court of International Trade in a Sept. 13 confidential order upheld parts and sent back parts of the Commerce Department's final determination in the antidumping duty investigation on refillable stainless steel kegs from China. In a letter, Judge M. Miller Baker said he intends to issue the public version of the opinion Sept. 21, giving the parties until Sept. 20 to review the confidential information in the opinion. In the case, Commerce dropped its reliance on Malaysian surrogate data after the trade court raised questions over the distortive effects of forced labor in Malaysia (see 2111050033). While the plaintiff, American Keg Co., signed off on this move, the plaintiff continued to oppose Commerce's surrogate data pick, pushing instead for Brazilian surrogate data (New American Keg d/b/a American Keg Co. v. U.S., CIT #20-00008).
The Commerce Department legally dropped its reliance on adverse facts available for whether countervailing duty respondent Both-Well (Taizhou) Steel Fittings Co. benefitted from China's Export Buyer's Credit Program, the Court of International Trade held in a Sept. 13 opinion. Judge Claire Kelly previously sent back Commerce's use of adverse facts available over the Chinese government's unwillingness to submit certain information about its EBCP. The judge said that if the agency wanted to keep using AFA it had to attempt to verify the non-use of the program by looking at evidence from Both-Well and its U.S. customers. Commerce did so on remand, finding that the respondent did not benefit from the EBCP, dropping the company's CVD rate from 25.90% to 15.36%.
The Commerce Department has the authority to address a particular market situation in an antidumping case when normal value is based on home market sales, AD petitioner Wheatland Tube argued in its Sept. 12 opening brief at the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. The Federal Circuit should overturn the Court of International Trade's ruling, which found that Commerce acted illegally in relying on constructed value when it found that a PMS distorted the cost of production of the home market sales (Saha Thai Steel Pipe Public Co. v. United States, Fed. Cir. #22-1175).
The Court of International Trade upheld the Commerce Department's second remand results in the countervailing duty investigation into ripe olives from Spain. Judge Gary Katzmann in a Sept. 14 opinion ruled Commerce properly found that certain subsidy programs were de facto specific to Spanish olive growers. He also said Commerce reasonably found from consumption data that the demand for certain varietals of raw olives is "substantially dependent on the demand for table olives."
CBP must refund the interest accrued on duty overpayments, phone case importer Otter Products argued in a Sept. 12 motion for judgment at the Court of International Trade. Having had the duty overpayments themselves refunded following prior court action at CIT and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, Otter took to the court again to request the interest. The plaintiff argued that since the full payments were never made voluntarily, it is entitled to a refund of the interest accrued on the payments made in connection with prior disclosures, and that the statute unambiguously mandates the maximum penalty for prior disclosures involving negligent conduct (Otter Products v. United States, CIT #22-00033).
The Court of International Trade in a Sept. 13 opinion found the Commerce Department reasonably used adverse facts available in a countervailing duty case related to the Chinese government's failure to submit certain information about the Export Buyer's Credit Program. Marking a clear departure from the trade court's numerous past rulings on the subject, Judge M. Miller Baker said Commerce reasonably explained why it needed the information from the Chinese government to verify that the respondents and their U.S. customers did not use the EBCP. The judge further sided with the U.S. over its positions that acrylic polymer can be used as a stand-alone primer and that the agency can average all freight routes to establish a world market benchmark for ocean freight.
The following lawsuits were recently filed at the Court of International Trade:
Plaintiffs in a countervailing duty case, Tau-Ken Temir, JSC NMC Tau-Ken Samruk and Kazakhstan's Ministry of Trade and Integration, will appeal a July Court of International Trade ruling to the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, the plaintiffs said in a Sept. 11 notice of appeal. In the case, the trade court ruled the Commerce Department properly rejected Tau-Ken Temir's questionnaire responses for being untimely, as they were filed an hour and 41 minutes beyond the deadline (see 2207150035). The court said it is unclear why the plaintiffs failed to file an extension request earlier in the process rather than an hour and 10 minutes before the deadline (Tau-Ken Temir v. U.S., CIT #21-00173).