Trade Law Daily is a service of Warren Communications News.
Subscriber Login

Country of origin cases

to
articlessource documents
Refine Trend Search
Clear Terms

Search Primer

Term list: Separate terms with spaces, not commas or semicolons.

Multi-word term: Place inside quotes to ensure an exact match (e.g. "China import").

Acronyms: Use all capital letters to ensure the search is not looking for that letter sequence instead.

Required term: If a term must be included in any resulting articles, prefix it with a plus sign (e.g., +CBP).

Excluded term: If a term should be excluded from any articles being found, prefix it with a minus sign (e.g., -ruling).

Singular form: Always use the singular form when doing multi-word terms (e.g. "russian export control" instead of "russian export controls").

Shortest word form: When you have different word forms in a quoted (multi-word) term, you want to only include the shortest version if it is the last part of the expression (e.g., "entity list" instead of "entity listing" or "entity listed").

Commerce Can’t Require Review Respondents to Break the Law, Exporter Says
February 13, 2025 by Kathryn Nucci|Top News

Japanese exporter Nippon Steel argued Feb. 7 that the standard that respondents comply with antidumping and countervailing duty reviews to the best of their ability doesn’t require respondents to break their own governments’ laws (Nippon Steel Corporation v. United States, CIT Consol. # 21-00533).

Topics:Court of International Trade activity, Country of origin cases, Differential Pricing Analysis
Section 232 Tariff Expansion Likely to Survive Judicial Scrutiny, Lawyers Speculate
February 13, 2025 by Jacob Kopnick|Top News

President Donald Trump's recent expansion of Section 232 steel and aluminum tariffs likely would survive a judicial challenge, particularly in light of the string of cases challenging the Section 232 duties imposed during his first term, trade lawyers told us. Thomas Beline, partner at Cassidy Levy, said Trump's move to eliminate the country-specific arrangements and product exclusions is "likely defensible," since the statute lets the president take any action he deems necessary where an agreement is "not being carried out or is ineffective."

Topics:Country of origin cases, Differential Pricing Analysis, Section 232 Exclusions
Trade Group Says Commerce Failed to Apply AFA to Tire Exporter, Even When It Meant To
February 10, 2025 by Kathryn Nucci|Litigation

A domestic steel trade group brought a complaint to the Court of International Trade Feb. 7 alleging that a mandatory respondent in a tire antidumping duty review “was attempting to pass off an [non-market economy] entity as a market-economy entity” and should have been hit with adverse facts available (United Steel, Paper and Forestry International Union v. United States, CIT # 25-00004).

Topics:Court of International Trade activity, Country of origin cases, Antidumping Surrogate Values