At the same time that trade-related False Claims Act cases cover an increasing number of types of allegations against importers and exporters, the rewards doled out to whistleblowers seems to be on the rise, Sidley Austin said in an April 29 analysis. Discussing increasing trade exposure in FCA cases in part two of a series on the practice (see 2104210028), Sidley said there is a trend of increased payout size. "These factors foreshadow an increase in trade-related FCA actions in the near future,” the firm said.
The following are short summaries of recent CBP “NY” rulings issued by the agency's National Commodity Specialist Division in New York:
The Court of International Trade remanded an antidumping case to the Commerce Department, finding that the agency's determination that wood flooring importer Jilin Forest Industry Jinqiao Flooring Group Co. was de facto controlled by the Chinese government lacked substantial evidence. Judge Richard Eaton, in the April 29 opinion, also found that Commerce's application of its non-market economy policy to Jilin did not clear the proper evidentiary standard, launching into an elongated discussion of the policy's original intent.
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit recently upheld a lower court decision that found the Commerce Department correctly applied adverse facts available to a Mexican exporter after it submitted corrected cost data without adequate information in an antidumping duty administrative review.
Shuren Qin, a Chinese national living in Wellesley, Massachusetts, pleaded guilty to illegally causing the export of more than $100,000 worth of U.S.-origin goods to Chinese military university Northwestern Polytechnical University, the U.S. Attorney's Office for the District of Massachusetts announced in an April 28 news release. Qin pleaded guilty to a litany of charges including conspiracy to unlawfully export items without an export license, visa fraud, money laundering and smuggling hydrophones from the U.S. to China, the Justice Department said. The illegally exported goods consisted of technology with underwater and marine applications to allegedly be used for NWPU's development of unmanned aerial vehicles, autonomous underwater vehicles and missile proliferation projects, Justice said. To import the goods, Qin created LinkOcean Technologies, subsequently sending the goods to China from the U.S., Canada and Europe.
Diamond sawblades made by Protech in Canada from a core and segments each of Chinese and non-Chinese origin are not subject to antidumping duties on diamond sawblades from China (A-570-900), but some are covered by duties nonetheless due to Protech’s partial ineligibility for making the required certifications, the Commerce Department said in a scope ruling issued April 27.
The following are short summaries of recent CBP “NY” rulings issued by the agency's National Commodity Specialist Division in New York:
A newly issued CBP ruling further clarifies how the agency determines country of origin for electric motors. After having recently found that the stator and the rotor are the “most essential components” of an electric motor and, under a substantial transformation analysis, determine the country of origin (see 2104210041), the agency on April 22 issued another ruling that considered motors where the rotor and stator were made in different countries, and found the stator assembly controlling.
Petitioners in an antidumping duty investigation of seamless carbon and alloy steel standard, line, and pressure pipe from Ukraine recently filed briefs opposing a Ukrainian exporter’s proposal to negotiate a suspension agreement in the ongoing investigation. Tenaris USA, a domestic manufacturer that supports the petition, says a suspension agreement proposed by Interpipe “will not be effective, and that an antidumping duty order would better discipline Interpipe’s dumping of SSLPP in the United States,” in a filing April 27 with the Commerce Department.
The following are short summaries of recent CBP “NY” rulings issued by the agency's National Commodity Specialist Division in New York: