The Commerce Department and the International Trade Commission published the following Federal Register notices Jan. 23 on AD/CVD proceedings:
The following lawsuits were filed recently at the Court of International Trade:
The Commerce Department properly selected Germany as the third-country comparison market for determining antidumping duty respondent Prochamp's normal value in the AD investigation on preserved mushrooms from the Netherlands, the U.S. and Prochamp argued before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (Giorgio Foods v. United States, Fed. Cir. # 25-2090).
The U.S. will appeal a key Court of International Trade decision regarding the due process afforded to importers in antidumping duty and countervailing duty evasion investigations, per a Jan. 21 notice of appeal filed at the trade court (Superior Commercial Solutions v. United States, CIT # 24-00052).
The Commerce Department and the International Trade Commission published the following Federal Register notices Jan. 22 on AD/CVD proceedings:
The following lawsuits were filed recently at the Court of International Trade:
The U.S. and petitioners led by Accuride and Dexstar failed to show that the Commerce Department's scope ruling that wheels made in a third country with a mix of Chinese and third-country parts are covered by the scope of the antidumping duty and countervailing duty orders on steel trailer wheels from China should be sustained, exporter Asia Wheel argued (Asia Wheel Co. v. United States, Fed. Cir. #s 25-1689, -1694).
CBP has no legal basis to refuse the release of tires imported by Inspired Ventures, and the U.S. admitted in court that the agency's decision to exclude the tires from entry was "wrong," Inspired argued in a Jan. 20 motion for judgment at the Court of International Trade. The government admitted that Inspired's tires are "legally marked," then, to "save face," claimed the goods were being held on suspicion of undervaluation, yet CBP never issued the proper customs form to contest the importer's valuation of the goods, the brief said (Inspired Ventures v. United States, CIT # 24-00062).
Various importers, led by Centric Pipe, defended their attempt to add two due process claims to their case against a finding of antidumping duty and countervailing duty evasion, arguing that they have standing to make the claims and didn't fail to exhaust the issues (Centric Pipe v. United States, CIT Consol. # 25-00182).
The Commerce Department and the International Trade Commission published the following Federal Register notices Jan. 21 on AD/CVD proceedings: