The following lawsuit was filed recently at the Court of International Trade:

The Commerce Department failed to correct for respondent Dongkuk S&C's conversion costs and improperly relied on Dongkuk's information from a past antidumping duty review as the basis for constructed value ratios, petitioner Wind Tower Trade Coalition argued in a July 9 complaint at the Court of International Trade. The petitioner brought the suit to contest the 2022-23 review of the AD order on utility scale wind towers from South Korea (Wind Tower Trade Coalition v. United States, CIT # 25-00104).

Power supply and cables importer PowerTec Solutions agreed on July 8 to the government’s partial motion to dismiss the importer's case seeking a duty refund (PowerTec Solutions International v. United States, CIT # 22-00322).

Wooden cabinet importers led by Cabinetworks Group argued June 27 that the U.S. hadn’t acknowledged the impact of Loper Bright on the Commerce Department’s ability to conduct circumvention determinations -- Congress didn’t “delegate unfettered authority to Commerce,” they said (ACProducts v. United States, CIT #s 24-00155, -00156).

The Court of International Trade upheld the Commerce Department's decision to rescind the 2019 reviews of the antidumping duty and countervailing duty orders on aluminum extrusions from China with regard to exporter Kingtom Aluminio following CBP's decision to reverse its finding that Kingtom evaded the orders.

The Court of International Trade on July 8 dismissed importer PPG Industries' case against the International Trade Commission's affirmative injury determination on epoxy resins from China, India, South Korea, Taiwan and Thailand, for lack of prosecution. No complaint was filed within the statutorily prescribed period. Counsel for PPG didn't immediately respond to a request for comment (PPG Industries v. United States, CIT # 25-00101).

CBP erred when it applied a double substantial transformation test to importer JBF Bahrain's inputs when treaty language explicitly instructed it to use an alternative, JBF argued July 2 (JBF Bahrain v. United States, CIT # 23-00067).

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit set the oral argument date regarding two appeals against the legality of President Donald Trump's tariffs imposed under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act for Sept. 17. The 9th Circuit will be the second circuit court to hear arguments on the validity of the tariffs following the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit on July 31 (see 2506100076) (State of California v. Trump, 9th Cir. # 25-3493) (Susan Webber v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security, 9th Cir. # 25-2717).

Supporting the Commerce Department’s reluctant reversal on remand finding that bricks imported by Fedmet Resources Corp. weren’t covered by antidumping duties or countervailing duties on magnesia carbon bricks, (see 2503130022), the U.S. said July 3 that a petitioner’s opposition really seeks just to have the Court of International Trade reconsider its decision (Fedmet Resources Corp. v. United States, CIT # 23-00117).

The Court of International Trade in a confidential July 8 decision sustained the Commerce Department's remand results in a case on the 2021-22 review of the antidumping duty order on frozen warmwater shrimp from India.