Trade Law Daily is a service of Warren Communications News.
Subscriber Login
Litigation
to
Refine Category Search
Clear Terms

Search Primer

Term list: Separate terms with spaces, not commas or semicolons.

Multi-word term: Place inside quotes to ensure an exact match (e.g. "surrogate value").

Acronyms: Use all capital letters to ensure the search is not looking for that letter sequence instead. (e.g., CIT).

Required term: If a term must be included in any resulting articles, prefix it with a plus sign (e.g., CBP +ruling).

Excluded term: If a term should be excluded from any articles being found, prefix it with a minus sign (e.g., ruling -NY).

Simplest form: Use the simplest form of a term (e.g. "russian export control" instead of "russian export controls") or "entity list" instead of "entity listing" or "entity listed").

AD Petitioner Says Recent Decision on Turkish Duty Drawback Relevant for Related Litigation
June 9, 2025 by Jacob Kopnick|Litigation

The Aluminum Association Trade Enforcement Working Group, an antidumping duty petitioner, told the Court of International Trade that a recent CIT decision regarding respondent Assan Aluminyum's duty drawback adjustment is relevant for its case also involving a duty drawback adjustment claim from Assan (Assan Aluminyum Sanayi ve Ticaret v. United States, CIT # 21-00616).

Topics:Court of International Trade activity, Country of origin cases
US Making Post-Hoc Argument That Producers Can't Be Collapsed Across Borders, Petitioner Says
June 9, 2025 by Kathryn Nucci|Litigation

Following a voluntary remand which saw the Commerce Department maintain a prior determination, petitioner ArcelorMittal Tubular Products said that DOJ was inventing a new, post-hoc rule that entities couldn’t be collapsed across borders (ArcelorMittal Tubular Products v. United States, CIT # 24-00039).

Topics:Court of International Trade activity, Country of origin cases
Remand Definition of Wood Mouldings, Millwork Products Wouldn’t Expand Orders, US Says
June 9, 2025 by Kathryn Nucci|Litigation

The U.S. disagreed May 30 with an importer’s claim that the Commerce Department’s post-remand scope ruling on wood mouldings and millwork products expanded relevant antidumping duty and countervailing duty orders to cover “an infinite universe of products.” The orders are simply intentionally broad, it said (Hardware Resources v. United States, CIT # 23-00150).

Topics:Court of International Trade activity, Tariff classification rulings, Country of origin cases, CBP CROSS Rulings
CIT Definition of 'Fish Extracts' Too Broad, Importer Seeking Reconsideration of Ruling Says
June 9, 2025 by Kathryn Nucci|Litigation

Fish oil importer BASF Corp. sought reconsideration of the Court of International Trade’s May 2 ruling that its fish oil ethyl ester concentrates are “extracts of fish” under Harmonized Tariff Schedule heading 1603, not “food preparations” under heading 2106 (see 2505020018). It said the court “overlooked” Explanatory Note 16.03 for heading 1603 to create an impracticably broad definition of "fish extracts" (BASF Corp. v. United States, CIT Consol. # 13-00318).

Topics:Court of International Trade activity, Tariff classification rulings, Country of origin cases
CIT Sends Back New Shipper Review on Vietnamese Fish Exporter in Confidential Order
June 9, 2025 |Litigation

The Court of International Trade in a confidential order on June 5 sustained in part and remanded in part the Commerce Department's final results in the new shipper review of the antidumping duty order on frozen fish fillets from Vietnam. AD petitioner Catfish Farmers of America brought the suit to challenge the 2022-23 new shipper review of Vietnamese exporter Co May Import Export Company, which granted the company a de minimis dumping rate. The petitioner argued Co May didn't actually make a bona fide sale in the U.S. during the review period (Catfish Farmers of America v. U.S., CIT # 24-00126).

Topics:Court of International Trade activity