Trade Law Daily is a service of Warren Communications News.
Subscriber Login
Litigation
to
Refine Category Search
Clear Terms

Search Primer

Term list: Separate terms with spaces, not commas or semicolons.

Multi-word term: Place inside quotes to ensure an exact match (e.g. "China import").

Acronyms: Use all capital letters to ensure the search is not looking for that letter sequence instead.

Required term: If a term must be included in any resulting articles, prefix it with a plus sign (e.g., +CBP).

Excluded term: If a term should be excluded from any articles being found, prefix it with a minus sign (e.g., -ruling).

Singular form: Always use the singular form when doing multi-word terms (e.g. "russian export control" instead of "russian export controls").

Shortest word form: When you have different word forms in a quoted (multi-word) term, you want to only include the shortest version if it is the last part of the expression (e.g., "entity list" instead of "entity listing" or "entity listed").

Target Asks CAFC for More Time to File Reply Due to Holidays
January 2, 2024 by Jacob Kopnick|Litigation

Big box retailer Target Corp. asked the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit for more time to file its reply brief in its suit against the Court of International Trade's decision to order reliquidation of Target's entries that erroneously received a favorable antidumping duty rate. While the brief is currently due on Jan. 5, 2024, Target asked if it could submit its arguments on Jan. 19 "due largely to the circumstances of the holidays" (Target Corp. v. United States, Fed. Cir. # 23-2274).

Topics:Court of International Trade activity, Court of Federal Appeals Trade activity
Solar Cell Exporters Dump 3 Cases Challenging Affirmative Anti-Circ Finding
January 2, 2024 by Jacob Kopnick|Litigation

Plaintiffs on Dec. 20 dismissed three related cases challenging the Commerce Department's anti-circumvention findings regarding the antidumping and countervailing duty orders on solar cells from China. No reason for the dismissals was given. The suits were brought by exporters Red Sun Energy Long An Company, Trina Solar (Vietnam) Science & Technology Co., Trina Solar Energy Development Co., Trina Solar Co. and Trina Solar Science & Technology (Thailand).

Exporter Supports Commerce’s Motion to Remand Decision in Duty Drawback Adjustment Case
January 2, 2024 by Kathryn Nucci|Litigation

A Turkish aluminum foil exporter Dec. 22 sought expedited consideration of a request for a voluntary remand by the Commerce Department and challenged concerns raised by domestic petitioners in a case involving a duty drawback adjustment on its products (Assan Aluminyum Sanayi ve Ticaret v. U.S., CIT # 21-00616).

Topics:Court of International Trade activity, Differential Pricing Analysis