CIT Gives IEEPA Plaintiffs More Time to File Response to US Stay Motion
The Court of International Trade gave plaintiffs in the two successful challenges to President Donald Trump's tariff action taken under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act more time to respond to the government's motion to stay the trade court's decision to vacate Trump's executive orders imposing the tariffs (V.O.S. Selections v. Donald J. Trump, Fed. Cir. # 25-1812).
Sign up for a free preview to unlock the rest of this article
Timely, relevant coverage of court proceedings and agency rulings involving tariffs, classification, valuation, origin and antidumping and countervailing duties. Each day, Trade Law Daily subscribers receive a daily headline email, in-depth PDF edition and access to all relevant documents via our trade law source document library and website.
Initially, Judges Gary Katzmann, Timothy Reif and Jane Restani gave the plaintiffs, who comprise five importers and 12 U.S. states, until 12 p.m. EST on May 30 to respond. The court's text-only order now gives the plaintiffs until June 2 at 5 p.m. EST to file their brief.
On May 28, CIT vacated and permanently enjoined all EOs so far issued under IEEPA (see 2505280068). The government immediately appealed and applied for an emergency stay. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit granted an administrative stay while it mulls the emergency stay bid (see 2505290039).