Trade-Related Court Cases Filed Nov. 11-17
The following lawsuits were filed at the Court of International Trade during the week of Nov. 11-17:
Sign up for a free preview to unlock the rest of this article
Timely, relevant coverage of court proceedings and agency rulings involving tariffs, classification, valuation, origin and antidumping and countervailing duties. Each day, Trade Law Daily subscribers receive a daily headline email, in-depth PDF edition and access to all relevant documents via our trade law source document library and website.
Shock Doctor, Inc., challenging CBP's denial of its protest claiming its athletic equipment of Harmonized Tariff Schedule subheadings 6114.30.3060, dutiable at 14.9%; 6114.20.0055, dutiable at 10.8%; and 6114.30.3070, dutiable at 14.9%, should be classified under subheading 9506.99.6080, dutiable at 4%. # 24-00203. Filed Nov. 11.
Fore Fathers Apparel LLC, challenging CBP's denial of its protest claiming its men's and boys' shirts, classified under Harmonized Tariff Schedule subheadings 6105.20.2010 and 6105.20.2020, dutiable at 32%, should be subject to a 0% duty rate under the U.S.-Korea Free Trade Agreement. # 24-00204. Filed Nov. 13.
Appeals of CIT Decisions
No appeals of Court of International Trade decisions were filed at the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit during the week of Nov. 11-17.