CIT Lets US Share Certain Confidential Information With Ninestar's Officers
The Court of International Trade in a Jan. 16 order allowed some changes proposed by the U.S. to the amended protective order (APO) in exporter Ninestar Corp.'s case against its addition to the Uyghur Forced Labor Prevention Act Entity List, but it denied a motion from Ninestar to amend the protective order (Ninestar Corp. v. U.S., CIT # 23-00182).
Sign up for a free preview to unlock the rest of this article
Timely, relevant coverage of court proceedings and agency rulings involving tariffs, classification, valuation, origin and antidumping and countervailing duties. Each day, Trade Law Daily subscribers receive a daily headline email, in-depth PDF edition and access to all relevant documents via our trade law source document library and website.
Ninestar's bid to amend the protective order would have defined a new class of information, dubbed "Ninestar Confidential Information," that can be shared with Ninestar and its employees. The government's amendments, meanwhile, allow only Ninestar's "executive leadership" to see only some of the confidential information. The exporter filed the motion in light of the government sharing certain confidential information only with Ninestar's counsel, not with the company itself (see 2401160044).
Judge Gary Katzmann rejected Ninestar's bid to alter the order "without prejudice to the parties' rights to propose further modification of the terms of the APO or to challenge the designation of materials as 'Confidential Information' or 'Ninestar Confidential Information' under the APO or as privileged." The judge additionally noted that Ninestar's counsel can disclose the portions of the record the U.S. labeled "Ninestar Confidential Information" with the "officers or directors" of the exporter.