Thai Mattress Exporter Bows Out of CIT Case in Which It Received Over 760% AD Rate
The Court of International Trade in an Oct. 4 order granted a consent motion to remove antidumping duty respondent Saffron Living Co. from a case on the AD investigation on mattresses from Thailand. Per the motion to remove, Saffron said it withdrew from participation in the underlying AD investigation and "has thus concluded that continued participation in this appeal is no longer in its commercial interests" (Brooklyn Bedding. et al. v. United States, CIT # 21-00285).
Sign up for a free preview to unlock the rest of this article
Timely, relevant coverage of court proceedings and agency rulings involving tariffs, classification, valuation, origin and antidumping and countervailing duties. Each day, Trade Law Daily subscribers receive a daily headline email, in-depth PDF edition and access to all relevant documents via our trade law source document library and website.
In the case at CIT, the Commerce Department shifted on remand to relying entirety on adverse facts available, hiking Saffron's AD rate up from 37.48% to 763.28% (see 2309200030). Commerce issued the remand redetermination in response to an opinion from the trade court rejecting the agency's reliance on unverified data from Saffron and its refusal to apply either the transactions disregarded rule or major input rules due to Saffron's substantial affiliated-party transactions (see 2307210031).