Over a two-day review at the World Trade Organization on China's trade policies, China insisted that intellectual property violations are no longer a major issue; that its support of state-owned enterprises is no different from Fannie Mae; and that its overcapacity in steel is not a problem for global steel prices, because China only exports 9 percent of its steel. Moreover, China's Commerce Vice Minister Wang Shouwen said, addressing overcapacity needs collective actions and China stands ready to join hands with other countries to tackle this problem together.
Sen. Rob Portman will become the latest Republican to try to address the way the administration has wielded Section 232 tariffs, quotas and threats of tariffs. Portman, who represents Ohio and is a former U.S. trade representative, is working on a bill that would change the statute that currently allows the president to take action on whether imports imperil national security while recognizing "the close relation of the economic welfare of the Nation to our national security." The law says that substantial unemployment, loss of skills or investment and declining tax revenues should be considered "in determining whether such weakening of our internal economy may impair the national security."
A hearing on proposed Section 232 tariffs on automobiles, including cars, SUVs, vans and light trucks, and automotive parts, will only take place on July 19, with a subsequent day of hearings unnecessary due to a lack of requests to testify, the Commerce Department said. Commerce had originally scheduled the hearings for July 19 and 20 (see 1805290056), but only 45 requests to appear at the hearing were received. “Because these requests can all be accommodated on a single day, the second day of the hearing originally scheduled for July 20 is cancelled,” Commerce said. “The hearing will be held on July 19 only. The hearing will begin at 8:30 am and will end at 5:30 pm.” The hearing will still be held at Commerce Department headquarters in Washington.
A bipartisan bill that would require congressional approval before tariffs are imposed on national security grounds was introduced in the House of Representatives July 11. Like the so-far-unsuccessful efforts of Sen. Bob Corker, R-Tenn., the bill would be retroactive. The Section 232 tariffs and quotas on aluminum and steel would be rolled back after passage, and approval of those actions would be needed before they could resume.
It's only a "baby step" toward sparing Canada, Mexico and the European Union from steel and aluminum tariffs, as Sen. Bob Corker, R-Tenn., said, but 88 senators issued a rebuke of how the president has justified steel and aluminum tariffs under the guise of national security. Eleven senators -- all Republicans -- voted no, including both senators from Idaho, Wyoming and South Carolina. The last state could be badly damaged if President Donald Trump levies tariffs on imported auto parts under the same national security justification. Corker's home state of Tennessee also would be vulnerable if an auto parts tariff is implemented.
The Office of the U.S. Trade Representative’s list of proposed tariff subheadings set for an additional 10 percent tariff on $200 billion in imports from China covers wide swaths of the tariff schedule that initially avoided Section 301 tariffs imposed July 6. While the 25 percent tariff already in place affects only goods of Chapters 84, 85, 86, 87, 88, 89 and 90 (with a few exceptions), USTR’s proposed list of additional subheadings includes products from nearly all sectors of the tariff schedule, with the notable exceptions of footwear and apparel and pharmaceuticals.
The Consumer Technology Association, the National Retail Federation and the Semiconductor Industry Association are among groups and companies requesting to appear at a July 24 Office of the U.S. Trade Representative hearing about the Section 301 tariffs on a second list of 284 lines of Chinese-sourced products proposed for the higher duties (see 1806210029). The Retail Industry Leaders Association and the National Association of Foreign-Trade Zones are also among the commenters in docket USTR-2018-0018. Written comments are due July 23, and post-hearing rebuttal comments, July 31.
Nearly two weeks after the last batch of Section 232 tariff exclusion determinations were posted, the Bureau of Industry and Security posted eight more denials, all for Borusan Mannesmann Pipe in Texas, a Turkish-owned oil country tubular goods production facility.
CBP on July 6 published additional guidance on the application of Section 232 tariffs to steel and aluminum products. A CSMS message issued by the agency includes an overview of requirements for foreign-trade zone admissions for products covered by the tariffs, as well as information on the application of Chapter 98 provisions, temporary importations under bond, and NAFTA originating goods and duty deferral restrictions.
The Office of the U.S. Trade Representative on July 6 announced procedures for requesting product exclusions from Section 301 tariffs on products from China, on the same day that the 25 percent tariffs took effect (see 1807060012). Exclusion requests will be due by Oct. 9, and if granted will apply retroactively starting from July 6. Exclusions will be made on a “product basis,” so “a particular exclusion will apply to all imports of the product, regardless of whether the importer filed a request,” USTR said.