The two excluded sectors from planned Europe trade talks -- agriculture and autos -- both want to be included, according to comments filed with the Office of the U.S. Trade Representative ahead of the Dec. 14 public hearing on negotiation priorities. More than 150 organizations and individuals shared their views in the USTR docket ahead of the Dec. 10 deadline for comments.
The U.S. Chamber of Commerce will support the new NAFTA, and will lobby for its passage, the group announced Dec. 10. CEO Thomas J. Donohue wrote that the group will be working to resolve a handful of outstanding issues, but only specifically mentioned the Section 232 tariffs on Mexican and Canadian steel and aluminum. He spent far more time scolding President Donald Trump for his intention to terminate NAFTA "in order to present the incoming Congress with a choice between the new agreement and no agreement. We disagree with this strategy." Donohue wrote, "Issuing this threat against a co-equal branch of government is neither necessary nor productive and could actually cost votes." A prominent free-trade Democrat in the House of Representatives made the same point on Dec. 10 (see 1812100024).
Cable modems that are made up of Chinese parts but assembled in Mexico are subject to the 10 percent Section 301 tariffs on goods from China, CBP said in a Nov. 27 ruling. The ruling request was submitted by Barnes Richardson lawyer Lawrence Friedman on behalf of Zoom Telephonics. CBP's analysis is on two types of modems, one type that includes a Wi-Fi gateway and one that does not. The modems are Data Over Cable Service Interface Specification (DOCSIS) 3.1 and compatible with several major cable systems, including Comcast and Cox, it said.
Automakers, titanium producers and drug industry players shared diverging views inside their respective sectors of how Office of the U.S. Trade Representative negotiators should approach a U.S.-Japan free trade agreement. The department invited the public to share opinions Dec. 10 on what priorities negotiators should pursue, and how the new deal should be similar or diverge from the path forged for the U.S.-Mexico-Canada Agreement and the Trans-Pacific Partnership. Autos are the single biggest import from Japan, making up $51 billion of the $136 billion in goods imports in 2017, according to USTR.
Importers paid more than $6 billion total in tariffs in October, the first full month that there were additional tariffs on $200 billion in Chinese goods, according to an analysis from Tariffs Hurt the Heartland. The group said that amount -- which is $3.1 billion more than was paid in October 2017 -- has not slowed imports on the tariffed goods, but has drastically cut exports that are subject to retaliatory tariffs. The group is funded in part by farm interests, who have been particularly hard-hit by retaliation. Their Dec. 7 release said that imports subject to new tariffs declined 0.6 percent in October, while exports targeted for retaliation fell 37 percent. About two-thirds of the increase is for Section 301 tariffs, while steel and aluminum tariffs cost an additional $446 million. The goods on the Section 301 list would have cost $394 million in tariffs before the action; in October, tariffs on those imports were $2.6 billion. CBP recently said it has assessed more than $10 billion under the recent Trump administration Section 201, 232 and 301 trade remedies (see 1811260010).
Increased material costs was the top cost pressure for 20 percent of CEOs surveyed by the Business Roundtable, and that group's leader said tariffs are the reason why. Only labor costs was mentioned by more CEOs. Business Roundtable CEO Josh Bolten said that while the survey, released Dec. 7, didn't ask which set of tariffs is the problem, he's hearing from companies that metals tariffs are a bigger burden than the Section 301 tariffs. That's because a relatively small amount of production uses inputs from lists one and two of Chinese imports, and steel is used in many sectors. "The ones that have gotten the biggest public attention are the auto manufacturers," he said, "but really it's across the membership."
The World Trade Organization's dispute settlement body agreed to set up two more panels to judge whether the U.S. was justified in levying aluminum and steel tariffs on trading partners under a national security rationale. The decision, made Dec. 4, added Switzerland and India to the list of eight countries and the European Union that will have panels challenge the tariffs (see 1811210029).
President Donald Trump called tariffs "the best way to max out our economic power" but also suggested negotiations with China could be extended beyond the "90 days from the date of our wonderful and very warm dinner with President Xi in Argentina," in a series of tweets Dec. 4. "President Xi and I want this deal to happen, and it probably will. But if not remember, ...... ....I am a Tariff Man," he said. "We are right now taking in $billions in Tariffs. MAKE AMERICA RICH AGAIN."
International Trade Today is providing readers with some of the top stories for Nov. 26-30 in case they were missed.
The Trump administration is promising not to hike tariffs on China until the end of March 2019, so ports, retailers, the apparel industry and other business interests are breathing a sigh of relief. The administration described it as a 90-day pause in the conflict so that the two sides could have time to negotiate structural changes in China's economic approach, but it's actually 120 days, because the 90-day clock starts on Jan. 1, 2019, according to Larry Kudlow, the president's top economic adviser. That is the day the 10 percent tariff on $200 billion in Chinese imports was scheduled to increase to 25 percent.