The Retail Industry Leaders Association objected to FCC Lifeline USF proposals that would "weaken" the program and reduce or eliminate "availability to thousands -- perhaps millions -- of low income families." A "proposal to categorically exclude wireless resellers from Lifeline would be especially problematic," RILA filed Wednesday in docket 17-287. "Removal of those providers from the Lifeline program would leave low-income households with no available wireless Lifeline options." It also criticized a possible FCC budget cap that would deny services to qualifying households and a proposal to require low-income participant co-pays. The group said its 200-plus members have $1.5 trillion in annual sales and many are vendors of wireless services for major carriers. The FCC didn't comment Friday.
Tribal telco representatives praised FCC targeted USF relief, but one voiced concern about a left-out carrier, and the others said further steps are needed. The agency Thursday voted, with Chairman Ajit Pai partially concurring and Democratic commissioners partially dissenting, for relaxed operating-expense restrictions on rate-of-return telcos primarily serving tribal lands, attaching broadband conditions to target the extra funding (see 1804050028). It's "significant for the providers and the communities they serve," emailed Patrick Halley, Wilkinson Barker counsel to Saddleback Communications, one of five carriers staff expects to be covered. "While more can certainly be done to address the Tribal broadband deployment gap, Chairman Pai and the Commission are to be commended for recognizing the higher costs incurred in maintaining and deploying broadband networks on Tribal lands," he said. "We are pleased the commission recognized the need of some of the tribes," said Randy Tyree of GRTyree Consulting, who represents the National Tribal Telecommunications Association and Mescalero Apache Telecom. "We're very concerned about Mescalero Apache not being able to receive relief just because they built out their broadband further than the others. Without this relief, Mescalero is certainly going to have to look at other alternatives" for funding. Mescalero wants "to remain constructive and see what" it can do with the agency, he added. Gila River Telecommunications, another carrier expected to receive relief, is pleased the FCC "has finally adopted this order that will ensure USF support better reflects the cost of providing service on tribal lands," emailed counsel Gregory Guice of Akin Gump, who also lauded Pai's work and lawmaker attention. "We do, however, agree with the Chairman that it is too bad that certain restrictions were placed on this change, particularly ones that penalize companies that have built out their networks, as those companies will incur more operating costs for that action."
A court upheld FCC orders requiring ILECs provide some unsubsidized voice service during a USF transition to broadband-oriented high-cost support, dealing a loss to telco interests. A panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit Friday cited deference to regulators in denying incumbent telco challenges that argued the FCC improperly granted them only partial forbearance from the voice duties before new USF mechanisms are in place (see 1607120073). The panel questioned AT&T's attorney more extensively than the government's at oral argument (see 1710260054).
An Idaho USF task force should ask the Legislature to revamp universal service “in light of the fundamental underlying shift in telecommunications technology,” Idaho Public Utilities Commission staff recommended in a Wednesday report that followed a Jan. 17 PUC workshop on the future of USF (see 1801170030). The commission lacks authority to change state USF without statutory changes, staff said. Landline use declined as wireless and VoIP usage increased, PUC staff said. “As the IUSF-assessed telecommunications services decline, so too does the balance of the Fund, making it increasingly difficult for the Fund to remain solvent and fulfill its underlying statutory intent.” Staff said “parties agree the IUSF is unsustainable without major changes to the statute and funding methodology.” VoIP and wireless providers “must contribute to the Fund if the Fund's purpose is to be maintained,” it said. “If the technologies and purpose underlying the Fund have changed so much that the notion of universal service should also change, Staff would support an update to the universal service statutory regime.”
The FCC gave a few tribal-oriented telcos additional USF support for operating costs it said were well above average. The two Democratic commissioners partially dissented and the agency's chief partially concurred, citing changes he made to win OK. The commission Thursday released as expected (see 1804040056) a modified, long-pending order to relax 2016 operating-expense (opex) restrictions on rate-of-return telco high-cost support for carriers primarily serving tribal land. Broadband deployment and competition conditions were added to target the relief to an estimated five providers.
Stakeholders agree Alaska shouldn’t terminate state USF and that the current fee is too high, GCI observed in Tuesday reply comments at the Regulatory Commission of Alaska in docket R-18-001. But the company and others continued to disagree over the right path forward, as they did in initial comments (see 1802270034). State Rep. David Guttenberg (D) said an industry proposal by the Alaska Telephone Association “does not adequately address how the AUSF should be reformed in order to support the infrastructure Alaska needs to bridge its digital divide and grow and diversify our economy in the 21st century.” It “would enshrine current carrier support without doing anything to enhance carrier accountability.” Industry’s suggestion to wait until 2029 to decide if AUSF should be retained, amended or repealed is “simply unacceptable,” he said. “That's over ten years of support that could be used to help Alaskans get better access to faster broadband. That's over ten years that the rest of the world will be building the infrastructure of the future.”
An FCC order providing some USF relief for tribal operational expenses looks imminent, agency officials said Wednesday. Commissioner Mignon Clyburn and Chairman Ajit Pai traded fire in February over Clyburn's decision to change her vote to a partial dissent. She said the order should also act to expand tribal broadband (see 1802020058). The FCC recently issued an NPRM proposing a tribal broadband factor to target additional USF support to Native American lands (see 1803230025).
Modified FCC rules on rural telco consumer broadband-only loop (CBOL) service costs take effect May 3, after publication in Tuesday's Federal Register. A USF and intercarrier compensation order reconsidering access recovery charge treatment and a surrogate cost methodology for rate-of-return CBOLs was released Feb. 16 (see 1802200032).
The FCC should waive a $400 million rural health care USF program cap and fully fund qualified applications, said the Schools, Health & Libraries Broadband Coalition Tuesday, noting it filed an emergency petition in docket 17-310. Recent RHC program cuts of more than 15 percent to individual health-care providers and 25 percent to consortia (see 1803160040) "will severely degrade the quality of healthcare in rural America," SHLB said. “Health care providers from Alaska to New England will face significant financial hardship from this unexpected funding decrease, potentially resulting in downgraded telehealth services, staff layoffs, or even bankruptcy,” said Executive Director John Windhausen. “There is no way that applicants could have predicted the size of the funding cutbacks this year, which have no precedent in the 20-year history of the program.” An FCC spokesman had no immediate comment but noted a December NPRM launched a rulemaking on possible RHC program changes.
The Competitive Carriers Association has major concerns about an NPRM set for a vote at the April 17 commissioners’ meeting proposing to prevent use of money in any USF program to buy equipment or services from companies that “pose a national security threat” to U.S. communications networks or the communications supply chain, President Steve Berry told us Tuesday. “The FCC has injected uncertainty at a time when carriers need certainty most,” as they are getting set for the Connect America Fund Phase II and Mobility Find II auctions and “building out 600 and 700 MHz spectrum,” Berry said. “This will most certainly impact the United States’ efforts to win the global race to 5G.” The Rural Wireless Association and NTCA also expressed concerns (see 1804020054). CCA was preparing for its spring meeting last week when FCC Chairman Ajit Pai circulated the draft NPRM. “CCA and its members care about national security and support prosecution of those who violate known national security policy,” Berry said. “Nevertheless, the FCC’s proposal to prohibit the use of USF to purchase any equipment or services produced or provided by any company posing a national security threat is incredibly broad and could impact every aspect of the communications supply chain with or without ever taking USF or purchased Chinese or Russian equipment and/or services.” Berry conceded the NPRM raises complicated issues. “CCA members care deeply about the security of their customers and the country and are focused on working towards comprehensive solutions,” he said. “I would hope any action taken by the FCC will move our nation to a broad solution and not a half measure that unduly paralyzes consumers in rural America.” Many smaller carriers have cut deals with Chinese equipment makers Huawei and ZTE, which worked hard to penetrate the U.S. market (see 1803260037).