Trade Law Daily is a service of Warren Communications News.
Subscriber Login

Chip Export News

The U.S. maintains export controls on chips, semiconductors, and related technology to China and Chinese companies such as Huawei. The following are recent ECD articles about chip export controls:

to
articlessource documents
Refine Trend Search
Clear Terms

Search Primer

Term list: Separate terms with spaces, not commas or semicolons.

Multi-word term: Place inside quotes to ensure an exact match (e.g. "surrogate value").

Acronyms: Use all capital letters to ensure the search is not looking for that letter sequence instead. (e.g., CIT).

Required term: If a term must be included in any resulting articles, prefix it with a plus sign (e.g., CBP +ruling).

Excluded term: If a term should be excluded from any articles being found, prefix it with a minus sign (e.g., ruling -NY).

Simplest form: Use the simplest form of a term (e.g. "russian export control" instead of "russian export controls") or "entity list" instead of "entity listing" or "entity listed").

‘Downstream Products’ in CVD Law Doesn’t Just Mean Subject Merchandise, Petitioner Says
April 22, 2024 by Kathryn Nucci|Litigation

A manufacturer must have attributed to them all subsidies received by a cross-owned input supplier’s upstream product that is “primarily dedicated to the production of the downstream product,” a domestic petitioner said in an April 17 brief before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. It also argued that the “downstream product” doesn’t need to be “subject merchandise” (Gujarat Fluorochemicals v. U.S., Fed. Cir. # 24-1268).

Topics:Court of International Trade activity, Court of Federal Appeals Trade activity
Domestic Trade Committee Says CVD Costs Should Be Deducted From Exporters’ US Prices
April 12, 2024 by Kathryn Nucci|Litigation

A number of Canadian lumber exporters moved for judgment upon the agency record in a softwood lumber case April 5. So did defendant-intervenors led by a domestic petitioner group, which said that the Commerce Department should have subtracted countervailing duty costs from the exporters’ U.S. prices (Government of Canada v. U.S., CIT Consol. # 23-00187).

Topics:Court of International Trade activity, Country of origin cases