The following are short summaries of recent CBP “NY” rulings issued by the agency's National Commodity Specialist Division in New York:
CBP is investigating Gogo International in response to allegations of evasion of antidumping duties required on imported diamond sawblades from China, CBP said in a May 19 notice. The investigation stems from allegations filed under the Enforce and Protect Act by the Diamond Sawblades Manufacturers’ Coalition, CBP said. The group alleged that Gogo evaded AD/CV duties using transshipment. The coalition is represented by Wiley lawyer Daniel Pickard. The Commerce Department recently issued a scope ruling in the case following a CBP request (see 2104300081).
The following are short summaries of recent CBP “NY” rulings issued by the agency's National Commodity Specialist Division in New York:
The Customs Rulings Online Search System (CROSS) was updated May 27 with the following headquarters rulings (ruling revocations and modifications will be detailed elsewhere in a separate article as they are announced in the Customs Bulletin):
The Customs Rulings Online Search System (CROSS) was updated May 25 with the following headquarters rulings (ruling revocations and modifications will be detailed elsewhere in a separate article as they are announced in the Customs Bulletin):
CBP released its May 26 Customs Bulletin (Vol. 55, No. 20). While it contains recent court decisions, no customs rulings are included.
CBP is investigating Vivaldi Commercial and Vivaldi Interiors over allegations that the companies evaded antidumping and countervailing duty orders on quartz surface products from China, the agency said in a May 10 notice it recently posted. CBP began the investigation in response to allegations filed by Cambria Company, represented by Luke Meisner of Schagrin Associates.
The following are short summaries of recent CBP “NY” rulings issued by the agency's National Commodity Specialist Division in New York:
CBP prematurely posted two recent rulings involving the Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps in China and apparel importer Uniqlo (see 2105130031 and 2105200039), an agency spokesman said in a May 25 email. “The Uniqlo protest decisions, H318182 and H318835, were placed on the Customs Rulings Online Search System (CROSS) in error,” he said. “The underlying protests were withdrawn by the Protestant prior to a final disposition of the issues in accordance with 19 C.F.R. § 174.29. Accordingly, the documents were permanently removed from CROSS.” CBP removed the rulings on May 20 (see 2105210021). Neither Uniqlo nor Grunfeld Desiderio, a law firm mentioned in both the rulings, commented.
In the May 19 Customs Bulletin (Vol. 55, No. 19), CBP published a proposal to revoke and modify rulings on fire pits.