CTA hailed Michigan Gov. Rick Snyder (R) for signing into law Friday a legislative package (SB-995) that will allow full testing of autonomous vehicles in the state. "Self-driving and connected cars have the potential to reduce more than 90 percent of accidents caused by human error, provide previously unimagined independence to seniors and the visually impaired, eliminate hours wasted in traffic and minimize congestion,” CTA President Gary Shapiro said in a Friday statement. “To truly harness these benefits, we need more states to embrace Michigan's model to allow for efficient and safe testing of self-driving vehicles.” The Michigan legislature approved SB-995 and sent it to Snyder for his signature in November.

A North Carolina lawmaker who pledged to change the state law banning municipal broadband expansion held her seat in the state House after a recount in a close election. Rep. Susan Martin (R) represents Wilson County, where the North Carolina law banned Wilson Greenlight from expanding its municipal fiber broadband service into Pinetops. Martin and state Sen. Harry Brown (R), co-chairs of the Joint Legislative Economic Development and Global Engagement Oversight Committee, said they would sponsor community broadband legislation in 2017 (see 1611040037). Martin prevailed days after Republican governor and municipal broadband critic Pat McCrory conceded a contested gubernatorial race to Democratic Attorney General Roy Cooper (see 1612050053). The FCC lost a challenge to the North Carolina law earlier this year in the 6th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals.

The Dec. 1 telecom competition decision in California shouldn’t moot ISPs’ lawsuit against the state commission related to Form 477 data disclosure, plaintiffs argued. The California Public Utilities Commission voted to close the proceeding at issue in the U.S. District Court in San Francisco case, while ordering staff to probe telecom market competition (see 1612010061). AT&T, Comcast, CTIA, Verizon and other industry plaintiffs challenged a May 3 ruling in that proceeding compelling ISPs to disclose subscriber data to The Utility Reform Network (TURN) or other third parties. On Nov. 23, District Judge Vince Chhabria asked parties to show why the case shouldn’t be dismissed as moot given the CPUC’s plan to close the proceeding. Thursday, the ISPs responded (in Pacer) that the court could still provide relief to the companies. The Dec. 1 CPUC decision -- posted Friday in docket 15-11-007 -- required parties to continue submitting Form 477 and other confidential data, leaving open the confidentiality questions, the ISPs said. "The CPUC agrees that the May 3, 2016 Order is now moot, but has refused to agree that Plaintiffs will receive advance notice before public disclosure of their Form 477 data,” the ISPs said. “Therefore, this case is not moot. However, if this Court were to enter an order requiring reasonable advance notice and an opportunity to object (and, if necessary, to seek judicial review) before public disclosure of those data, the Court could then dismiss this case as moot.” The agency and TURN are to file responses by Dec. 15 under the judge’s order.

The Michigan Public Service Commission directed Lifeline eligible telecom carriers to keep using the existing Michigan Lifeline Eligibility Database but to add the Veterans and Survivors Pension Benefit Program as an eligibility criteria for potential Lifeline customers. Commissioners approved the order (Case No. U-18213) at a meeting Friday. Earlier this month, the FCC Wireline Bureau granted Michigan a waiver until Dec. 31, 2017, to align its Lifeline eligibility criteria and database with the updated federal commission rules (see 1612070043 and 1612010070). The order clarifies “the rules of the road” for Michigan providers after the FCC waiver, signaling it’s “really status quo going forward” until 2018, Michigan PSC Chairman Sally Talberg said in an interview Friday. Adding the veterans benefit program -- a requirement the FCC declined to waive -- should be “manageable,” she said. Talberg was “very pleased” by the FCC waiver order, she said. “We’ll need to be working diligently over the course of next year to make sure everything’s in place, including looking at the laws in our state and how they sync up with the new federal criteria,” she said. “But I think we’ll be in good shape to address all the issues during that time frame.” To reflect the changes, the PSC updated its online Lifeline eligibility database, is now revising its Lifeline consumer tips sheet, and plans to highlight changes in a news release and upcoming outreach events, a commission spokeswoman added.

The San Francisco Board of Supervisors voted to consult with the city attorney Dec. 13​ in closed session on a proposed ordinance prohibiting landlords of multi-dwelling units from interfering with tenants’ choice of communications service providers. The board voted 9-1 Tuesday in favor of the motion for closed session on item 161110, said meeting minutes posted Wednesday evening. The Electronic Frontier Foundation supported the proposed ordinance in a Sunday blog post. “San Francisco is one of the few places in the United States with significant broadband competition, but many renters are barred from taking advantage of alternatives to large Internet service providers like Comcast and AT&T,” EFF wrote. “Many landlords agree to restrict tenants’ choice of ISP in exchange for kickbacks from the favored provider.”

ViaSat and the Wireless Internet Service Providers Association voiced concerns to FCC officials about New York's state broadband plans, which are connected to a waiver bid at the commission. New York filed for an emergency waiver to tap federal Connect America Fund Phase II subsidy support -- currently slated for an FCC reverse auction -- for its own state broadband reverse auction (see 1610130047). Highlighting a meeting with an aide to FCC Chairman Wheeler and Wireline Bureau officials, a ViaSat and WISPA filing in docket 10-90 said they appreciated New York's broadband commitment, but the state's program "effectively grants a right-of-first-refusal to certain relatively costly technologies, without allowing other technologies that would be more cost-effective to deploy to compete for funds." They said New York's program relegates some technologies to "second tier status, while apparently excluding other technologies altogether -- without regard to the performance capabilities or cost-effectiveness associated with those technologies." A further FCC rulemaking would be a better forum to consider related issues, they said.

The Michigan Legislature sent a telehealth bill to the governor after the Senate passed it 36-0 Tuesday. DOJ supported the bill (SB-753), which adds “telehealth” to the Michigan Public Health Code, eases the process by which patients may consent to the treatments, and allows telehealth providers to prescribe drugs (see 1611290026). “Society has never been more connected, yet a patient’s ability to see a medical professional is becoming more and more constrained as hospital wait times grow,” bill sponsor Sen. Pete MacGregor (R) said in a news release. “This bill would help improve access to care, which could lead to healthier patient outcomes.”

Many state 911 programs struggle to verify that carriers remit all such surcharges or that public safety answering points (PSAPs) are using them appropriately, said the National Association of State 911 Administrators (NASNA). States should optimize revenue from existing 911 surcharge receipts before trying to establish a new funding model, NASNA said Wednesday, releasing a paper on challenges and best practices. Many states with 911 programs don’t have broad enough authority to ensure provider accountability, the paper said, with 28 states saying their 911 programs lack authority to ensure every provider collecting the surcharges remits the fee and 25 states saying their programs can’t obtain provider remittance data. Also, 30 state programs lack authority to audit remittances for accuracy, NASNA found. While 12 said other entities have auditing authority, “some indicated that they do not know whether these oversight activities actually occur or not,” NASNA said. “Regardless of who does it, if state statute does not provide for a check and balance, there is simply no way to know whether all providers that are required to remit their 911 fees actually do so. … That lack of basic oversight and enforcement may result in under-collection of funds.” Not all state 911 programs have authority to oversee use of 911 fees, NASNA said. In 12 states, the 911 program lacks authority to obtain PSAP records documenting use of 911 fees, it said. In 15 states, the program lacks authority to audit PSAP records for compliance, it said. In 18 states, the program can’t take enforcement action toward PSAPs where fund misuse is discovered, it said. Some state programs that have authority to oversee and take action against PSAPs lack resources to do it, NASNA said. The FCC estimated diversion led to $223.4 million of 911 fee revenue going to other purposes in 2014, and our May report found the three states said to do the most diversion seemed unlikely to quit the practice soon (see 1605310046).

Small LECs and a rural California country hit by outages supported a draft order on rural call completion issues under consideration by the California Public Utilities Commission. Cable companies urged the CPUC to do nothing and close the proceeding. Commissioner Catherine Sandoval wrote the proposed decision (PD) in docket I1405012, which may be considered at the Dec. 15 commissioners' meeting. In comments Monday, Mendocino County said evidence of service problems presented at a July hearing and seen since by rural customers "justify the PD making even stronger requirements for the Commission to adopt as they show a long-term pattern of service issues that lead to loss of dial-tone and 9-1-1 access." But the current PD is "an important step in the right direction" and a second phase of the proceeding will provide more time to address other issues, the county said. Calaveras Telecom and other rural LECs mostly supported the PD, saying it would address rural call completion issues raised by the small LECs. But they bristled at a proposal requiring carriers of last resort to report within 120 minutes of an outage of 300,000 user minutes that lasts at least 30 minutes -- a plan that Sandoval asked the FCC to consider (see 1612050050). The small RLECs urged the CPUC to reject the requirement, or at least modify time frames. For example, it’s not reasonable to require small carriers serving rural areas to quickly report outages that happen outside business hours, they said. The CPUC should qualify that, in that circumstance, carriers may report the outage 120 minutes after the start of the next business day, the small LECs said. Cox Communications and the California Cable & Telecommunications Association said the agency need not adopt new reporting requirements or keep the proceeding open to address other outage reporting issues. "The PD correctly finds that rural call completions issues have abated and in light of this finding, the PD should be modified to close this proceeding,” the cable companies commented.

Airbnb dropped a lawsuit against New York City and state over a state law that could hold the online property rental company liable for users who place advertisements for short-term rentals. The home-sharing company said it settled a complaint in U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York that invoked Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act (see 1611080029). Airbnb sees the settlement “as a material step forward for our hosts,” a company spokesman emailed Monday. “We look forward to using this as a basis to finding an approach that protects responsible New Yorkers while cracking down on illegal hotels that remove permanent housing off the market or create unsafe spaces.” In the agreement, Airbnb and the city agreed to work together on ways to address New York’s housing shortage, including through host compliance with Airbnb's One Host, One Home policy, the spokesman said. The Airbnb policy limits hosts to make their homes available for only short-term rentals. The New York governor and New York City mayor’s offices didn’t comment.