Consumer Watchdog, alleging self-driving truck company Otto is illegally testing its technology on California roads, wants the Department of Motor Vehicles to revoke the Uber-owned company's registrations. John Simpson, the advocacy group's privacy project director, said in a Wednesday news release that 21 companies have gotten permits to test their self-driving tech "with no problem. Moreover, self-driving vehicles weighing more than 10,000 pounds cannot be tested in the state under current regulations. Otto’s robot trucks fail on both counts. They have no permits and they weigh too much.” Consumer Watchdog, which filed its complaint with the DMV Tuesday, also said Uber can't be trusted because it's doing mapping operations in San Francisco with cars that aren't operating in self-driving mode. "Based on Otto’s behavior, there is absolutely no reason to take Uber’s word for anything," said Simpson, who wants Uber's car registrations to be revoked again. In December, the company began a self-driving pilot in San Francisco similar to Pittsburgh but the DMV pulled the cars' registrations after the company refused to get a permit to test the technology. Uber said at the time it didn't need a test permit because a human was either controlling or monitoring the cars (see 1701300012). The company didn't comment now.

ISPs supported an effort to spread broadband to Arizona rural schools through the state USF but urged the Arizona Corporation Commission to place limits on how money is used and how much is collected. The ACC held a workshop on the initiative last month (see 1701300033). “This initiative should target rural areas [and] should be of limited duration and for a limited amount, and should limit support to commercially-provisioned, finished services,” CenturyLink commented Tuesday in docket RT-00000H-97-0137. Cox said the program should be limited to last-mile projects and not support overbuilding where another carrier has facilities. Cox and CenturyLink agreed the program shouldn't fund dark fiber. AT&T supported CenturyLink and Cox in proposing to cap the rural schools broadband fund at $8 million. Cox and AT&T said the ACC should limit collection of the funds for one year, while CenturyLink proposed two years.

The Tennessee House introduced broadband legislation proposed by Gov. Bill Haslam (R) that would provide $45 million in broadband grants and tax credits, and allow nonprofit electric cooperatives to provide retail broadband service. House Leader Glen Casada (R) and Rep. David Hawk (R) introduced HB-529, and Senate Leader Mark Norris (R) is expected to introduce the Senate version (see 1701270037). Also Wednesday, Sen. Steve Southerland (R) introduced SB-528 -- the Senate version of HB-194 -- a bill to create a commission to coordinate state broadband policies. Tennessee is one state community broadband advocates are watching this year for state legislative action (see 1701260022).

The Arizona Corporation Commission approved an order to align Lifeline eligibility requirements with FCC updates to the low-income program. Commissioners cleared the order as part of the consent agenda at their Tuesday meeting. The commission also ordered Arizona eligible telecom carriers to remove Link Up from Arizona tariffs, except for ETCs receiving high-cost support on tribal lands. “All Arizona ETCs are expected to keep current with and to comply with all FCC rules and regulations governing the provision of Lifeline services,” the commission said in the Jan. 25 proposed decision.

The Wireless Infrastructure Association supported siting legislation in Virginia requiring localities to quickly review small-cells and other wireless infrastructure applications. The Senate passed SB-1282 last week. The House rejected a similar bill Monday but is expected to vote soon on the Senate version (see 1702060054). The bill would require localities to review a small-cell application within 60 days and other wireless infrastructure within 150 days, while limiting the reasons why a locality could say no to small cells. “This legislation will go a long way to eliminate delays and speed deployments for all wireless infrastructure including small facilities attached to existing structures,” WIA Senior Government Affairs Counsel Van Bloys emailed. “This bill also establishes reasonable deployment practices like encouraging collocations of communications facilities on existing structures and workable height limits for deployments in the rights-of-way. The only way cities and towns of all sizes are going to remain connected is through more wireless infrastructure.”

It’s faster to deny a petition on right-of-way rules by the California Cable and Telecommunications Association than to allow CCTA to withdraw it, the California Public Utilities Commission said in a proposed decision released Monday. Commissioners are to vote on denying the CCTA petition at their Thursday meeting. After learning last month that the CPUC planned to deny, CCTA asked to pull the petition to extend right-of-way (ROW) rules for commercial mobile radio services to cable (see 1701240038). Allowing the association to withdraw “would require the Commission to expend significant additional time and resources, including issuance of a new proposed decision that grants CCTA’s motion to withdraw Petition 16-07-009,” the draft said. The commission proposed to deny the petition without prejudice. “Upon receipt of further information in another proceeding, the Commission may choose to revisit its holding in today’s decision to deny the Petition,” the draft said. The draft didn’t address a similar petition by the Wireless Infrastructure Association to extend the CMRS right-of-way rules to wireless pole attachments by CLECs. CCTA declined to comment.

TDS may buy telecom assets of a Wisconsin utility in Sun Prairie, TDS said in a Monday news release. TDS signed a nonbinding letter of intent with the city-owned Sun Prairie Utilities to acquire all the utility’s assets for operation, transport, delivery and support of telecom services, TDS said. The parties plan to reach a final agreement by the end of March, TDS said. “Under the LOI we are signing, TDS will own and assume full responsibility for managing and operating our existing fiber network and build on the important work we started,” Sun Prairie Mayor Paul Esser said. “TDS would continue with our vision to have a highly connected community, accelerate investment, and expand communications services to include TV and phone offerings in addition to high speed internet service. This sale would divest the City and its taxpayers of any risk associated with the project.” The agreement reduced risk for the utility, Sun Prairie Utilities Commission Chairman Ted Chase said.

A wireless siting bill failed Monday in the Virginia House, but the chamber will soon vote on similar legislation from the Senate. The House was also expected Monday to have debated a controversial municipal broadband bill, with a final vote possible Tuesday, but legislators didn’t take up the bill before our deadline. The House voted 37-57 against the wireless siting bill (HB-2196) after the Senate voted 21-18 Friday to pass the similar S-1282. Both bills require localities to review a small-cells application within 60 days and other wireless infrastructure within 150 days, while limiting the reasons why a locality could say no to small cells. In floor debate, Del. Terry Kilgore (R) said the House bill was meant to untangle a “patchwork of numerous regulations across the commonwealth.” Del. John O’Bannon (R) said he opposed the bill but indicated he might take a different view when the chamber votes on S-1282. The Virginia muni-broadband bill (HB-2108), which has raised concerns by community broadband advocates and local governments, requires local broadband authorities to maintain and make publicly available records showing their compliance with pricing rules requiring that rates cover network costs (see 1702030051). Sponsor Del. Kathy Byron defended the bill in an email Friday. As revised, HB-2108 “provides transparency and accountability for taxpayers when government is investing their tax dollars in broadband services,” Byron said. “It still protects proprietary information and puts no restrictions on deployment of broadband.” The Republican delegate denied the bill requires municipal broadband authorities to disclose proprietary information, as claimed by community broadband advocates. She defended the Broadband Advisory Council, which some critics say has a conflict of interest because top industry lobbyists are members. The council also has members from the state House and Senate and a local government representative, as set by state statute, Byron said. Google, Netflix, NATOA, the Telecommunications Industry Association and other tech companies and associations on Monday again urged Virginia legislators to reject the Byron bill. “While the current version of HB 2108 no longer contains many of the troubling provisions in the prior versions, it would still have the same adverse effects,” they wrote in a letter to House members we obtained. Removing localities' right to protect sensitive business information would derail public-private partnerships, they said: “HB 2108 would also thwart economic, educational, and vocational opportunities that would contribute to a skilled workforce from which businesses across the state would benefit.”

FCC rules for states to opt out of FirstNet should allow opt-out plans that include “both a radio access network and a core network in order to leverage existing infrastructure and enable faster, lower cost deployment of the public safety broadband network,” Southern Linc said in a Thursday FCC filing. Representatives of the carrier said they made their case on opt-out rules to aides for all three commissioners. “Southern Linc representatives also encouraged the Commission to implement reasonable procedures that allow for rapid and cooperative review of state opt-out plans and urged the Commission to not disapprove any state plan without first providing the state with an opportunity to address any Commission concerns,” the company said. The filing was posted in docket 16-269.

Verizon agreed to process changes in Maryland for notifying customers and the Public Service Commission about copper-to-fiber migrations. The changes respond to concerns raised by the Maryland Office of People’s Counsel, which in December prompted the telco to postpone planned disconnections of copper service in the states (see 1612120030). The company, People's Counsel and PSC staff agreed to the Verizon process changes after meeting Dec. 20, Verizon said in a Wednesday letter to the agency. The company agreed to (1) change how it files notices with the PSC, (2) clarify action deadlines and other information in customer notices, (3) train staff to explain the difference between fiber voice services and Fios-branded voice services to customers, (4) clarify customer communications about battery back-up for fiber-based voice services, (5) migrate customers in waves and suspend or disconnect customers who don’t respond to copper retirement notices and (6) report periodically on network transformation projects in Maryland. “Verizon's Report satisfies OPC's immediate concerns about the confusing and potentially misleading notices that Verizon sent to Maryland consumers in the fall,” People’s Counsel Paul Carmody emailed Thursday. But it “does not resolve all of the issues raised by OPC's Petition requesting an investigation of Verizon's handling of the copper network,” she said. The PSC has requested comments by May 1 on the OPC petition, she said. “Maryland still regulates basic local phone service, and Verizon has a responsibility to maintain affordable, reliable service. Half of our State does not have a fiber network, and consumers have complained in those areas about service quality and the maintenance of the network.”