The “inconsistent patchwork” of state telehealth laws “hinders the natural deployment of telehealth,” said Rep. Doris Matsui, D-Calif., at an Information Technology and Innovation Foundation event Wednesday. Matsui and Rep. Bill Johnson, R-Ohio, introduced the Telehealth Modernization Act in December (http://1.usa.gov/1mCyJy4) in the hopes of bringing clarity by creating a federal definition of telehealth. “By establishing a workable federal definition of federal health, I'm hopeful states will look to this legislation for guidance in developing clear and consistent telehealth principles that benefit the nation as a whole,” Johnson said. Telehealth has received increased attention, with consumer advocates expressing concern about the practice’s privacy protections and about what they call a lack of government oversight. Matsui and Johnson’s bill would not address either issue, but Johnson stressed “privacy needs to be central” to any telehealth policy that states develop. “We've got hackers who hack into our databases; what’s to keep intruders from hacking into a telehealth session?” he said. But the first step is laying out a telehealth definition and principles “using a highest common denominator approach,” Matsui said. In the last year, more than 40 states have considered varying types of telehealth legislation, she said, creating market confusion that hinders telehealth for minorities, seniors and the disabled, which telehealth benefits. “Telehealth is, and will continue to be, invaluable in helping to resolve some of our nation’s most pressing health disparities,” she said.

Advertising tax deductibility is again at issue, among many other provisions, in a House proposal to revamp U.S. tax code. House Ways and Means Committee Chairman Dave Camp, R-Mich., issued the discussion draft Wednesday. “Under the provision, 50 percent of certain advertising expenses would be currently deductible and 50 percent would be amortized ratably over a ten-year period,” said the Ways and Means explanatory analysis of the draft (http://1.usa.gov/1hpq8wG). “This rule would phase in for tax years beginning before 2018 as follows: for tax years beginning in 2015, 80 percent of advertising costs would be deductible and 20 percent amortized; in 2016, 70 percent of advertising costs would be deductible and 30 percent amortized; and in 2017, 60 percent of advertising costs would be deductible and 40 percent amortized.” Advertising expenses are treated as business expenses now, it said. In November, NAB issued a statement saying it was strongly opposes “limits that would be placed on the ability of businesses to annually deduct costs for advertising.” The Camp analysis said the provision would “increase revenues by $169.0 billion over 2014-2023.” NAB slammed the provision in Camp’s draft. “NAB strongly opposes any job-killing proposal that would limit the ability of thousands of large and small businesses from fully deducting their annual advertising expenses,” NAB Executive Vice President Dennis Wharton said in a statement. “Advertising on local radio and television stations is a key driver of the American economy -- indeed, a recent study found local broadcast advertising generates $1.05 trillion in GDP and supports 1.48 million jobs.” The association will lobby “to ensure the advertising tax deduction continues to create economic prosperity and well-paying jobs,” Wharton said. USTelecom President Walter McCormick called the overall draft “a critical first step” and mentioned that it included “lowering the corporate tax rate to make U.S. companies more competitive in the world economy.”

The House Communications Subcommittee scheduled a hearing on the Satellite Television Extension and Localism Act for Wednesday at 10 a.m. in 2123 Rayburn, it said in a notice. The current law will expire at the end of 2014. “We remain on track to release a draft of the legislation by the end of March,” said Subcommittee Chairman Greg Walden, R-Ore., in a statement. The subcommittee did not announce witnesses. Meanwhile, Senate Commerce Committee leaders sought input from industry on STELA in a letter released Tuesday night (http://1.usa.gov/1c8CZ7y). “The pending STELA reauthorization offers the Committee a chance to consider whether present law appropriately protects and promotes a video market that is responsive to consumer demands and expectations,” said the letter, signed by Committee Chairman Jay Rockefeller, D-W.Va., ranking member John Thune, R-S.D., Communications Subcommittee Chairman Mark Pryor, D-Ark., and subcommittee ranking member Roger Wicker, R-Miss. “Various stakeholders already have identified a number of issues that the Committee could consider as part of the reauthorization of the Communications Act elements of STELA. These issues implicate both traditional entities that provide video services, as well as possible future entrants into the video marketplace.” They ask a wide range of questions, some specific to STELA and some on video policy broadly. Under the STELA questions, they asked, “Should the Congress modify this obligation or otherwise clarify what it means to negotiate retransmission consent in good faith? If so, how?” Walden has stressed STELA should not address retrans. The senators sent the letter to “a diverse array of stakeholders, including satellite TV, broadcasters, cable television, online video, broadband, public interest groups, and free market think tanks,” said a press release. The letter mentions Rockefeller’s video bill introduced last fall. “The Consumer Choice in Online Video Act, S.1680, is one approach to fostering a consumer-centric online video marketplace,” it said. “Are there elements of that bill that should be considered in conjunction with the STELA reauthorization?"

Several key committees of Congress are gearing up for satellite reauthorization. The House Communications Subcommittee scheduled a hearing next week on the reauthorization of the Satellite Television Extension and Localism Act (STELA), it said in a tweet (http://bit.ly/MYMsTp). STELA expires at the end of 2014 and is under the jurisdiction of both Commerce and Judiciary committees. House Communications Subcommittee Chairman Greg Walden, R-Ore., has pledged a STELA draft by the end of Q1 and indicated a desire not to address retransmission consent in the reauthorization process. Witnesses and other details haven’t been announced. House Judiciary Committee Chairman Bob Goodlatte, R-Va., told the NAB State Leadership Conference Tuesday that retrans is an issue “almost every member of Congress has heard about” and that House Judiciary will consider during more hearings on STELA: “These hearings will help inform the committee members on the issues as we move forward.” Following the speech, Goodlatte told reporters “we have made no decision” on whether to address retrans issues in STELA but promised hearings “soon,” with decisions later. During his speech, Goodlatte said “clearly, broadcasting has changed in ways that make our existing laws seem outdated” and indicated current consumer expectations can “clash” with copyright law written before the advent of the Internet. Goodlatte pointed to the Aereo case as one issue that “could reshape” how the broadcast industry reaches consumers. Sen. Amy Klobuchar, D-Minn., spoke to the Leadership Conference earlier, emphasizing STELA reauthorization. “I just talked about how we needed to get it done by the end of the year,” Klobuchar, a member of both Commerce and Judiciary, told us after the speech.

The FCC should defer to Congress in developing its net neutrality rules, House Judiciary Committee Chairman Bob Goodlatte, R-Va., said at the NAB State Leadership Conference Tuesday. “I've introduced legislation in the past to ensure there is open access on the Internet,” Goodlatte added. But the agency should always “be looking back at the laws,” because it’s full of “unelected bureaucrats,” and shouldn’t be forging the path, he said. “That, to me, is the better way to legislate,” Goodlatte said, saying if the FCC were to advance net neutrality without looking to legislation approved by Congress, it would be a “very bad harbinger for the future of freedom and democracy in the United States.” Goodlatte said he’s not familiar with the “details of the agenda” that FCC Chairman Tom Wheeler outlined earlier this month.

House Communications Subcommittee Chairman Greg Walden, R-Ore., wants a bill to end any possibility of the FCC resuming its Critical Information Needs study, he said in a press release Tuesday (http://1.usa.gov/MrukAA). House Republicans had for weeks questioned the design of the study, which originally included questioning of media organizations, saying they feared it would be a revival of the Fairness Doctrine. The FCC suspended the study last week and said it would no longer question any journalists. “It took nearly 25 years to get the Fairness Doctrine off the books once it had been ‘eliminated’ in 1987, and we will do whatever it takes to ensure this study or any other effort by the government to control the output of America’s newsrooms never sees the light of day,” Walden said. The subcommittee plans a hearing on the issue in addition to developing legislation, he said.

Comcast’s plan to buy Time Warner Cable may provide a way to “start the endowment” for public broadcasting, depending on how the deal proceeds, Rep. Earl Blumenauer, D-Ore., told members of the Association of Public Television Stations. “A crazy idea? Perhaps. But we need to be aware of opportunities like that.” Blumenauer founded the Public Broadcasting Caucus in 1999 and co-chairs it. He mentioned a “lot of concerns” about the proposed cable acquisition. “How are we going to establish a permanent endowment for public broadcasting?” Blumenauer asked, slamming the annual “circus” that surrounds funding it. He praised association members for “a magnificent outpouring of support,” which has helped buy them “breathing room,” he said Tuesday at the Library of Congress. But “the point for me is ‘can we build on this moment?'” he asked. “I hope we can.” He urged public broadcasters to take a look at the congressional recess calendar and encourage members of Congress to visit their stations when back in their home districts. Sen. Tom Harkin, D-Iowa, said funding for public broadcasting “has just kept pace with inflation” and “we can use a lot more.” There’s also a need for more than just money -- there’s a need to fight the “broader assault on our public institutions” and ideological attacks on public broadcasting, Harkin said. It’s “complete nonsense” to say public broadcasting advocates are “elitist” or “snobby,” Harkin insisted. He recalled former FCC Chairman Newton Minnow’s quote about TV being “a vast wasteland” and then Harkin derided Jersey Shore and Honey Boo Boo, which he said he hadn’t watched but his staff told him about. “That can’t be true,” Harkin had told his staff about the latter program, he said. “Duck Dynasty? Is that really a show?” He said there should be space for at least one public network. “I may be retiring from the Senate, but I'm not retiring from the fight,” said Harkin.

The Telecom Act of 1996 “ushered in several major advancements in communications,” FCC Commissioner Mignon Clyburn told the NAB State Leadership Conference Tuesday when mentioning a possible overhaul of the act. Congress should tweak the act if needed “without destroying the fabric of the law,” she said, emphasizing the importance of the nine pillars enshrined in the law. Clyburn also touched on the broadcast incentive auction and suggested perhaps the FCC should offer bidding credits so that spectrum acquired in auction could be used to supply fixed wireless to schools or anchor institutions. The FCC should “be more creative” in lowering barriers for small businesses, she said. “When the market does not operate fairly or efficiently, those in government should not hesitate to step in judiciously,” Clyburn said, saying she favors not only an even playing field but also one in which all potential participants are able to play. NAB President Gordon Smith praised Clyburn as both a commissioner and acting chairwoman, saying she spoke truly in promising an open door to broadcasters and “is open to the other side.” Sen. Amy Klobuchar, D-Minn., spoke to the conference earlier Tuesday. “The major substantive focus was on getting the incentive auction right, the importance of the auction for public safety,” Klobuchar told us after her speech. She also mentioned the need to get the repacking process handled properly and cited important spectrum coordination considerations along the borders with Canada and Mexico. “We need to get the incentive auction right.”

Opposition rose Tuesday hours before a scheduled floor vote Tuesday evening on a cellphone unlocking bill, the Unlocking Consumer Choice Act (HR-1123), sponsored by House Judiciary Committee Chairman Bob Goodlatte, R-Va. “It has overwhelming support in the House,” Goodlatte told reporters Tuesday afternoon after a speech at the NAB State Leadership Conference. He expressed no fear of any opposition derailing the legislation. Democratic Reps. Zoe Lofgren and Anna Eshoo both of California had on Monday urged colleagues to vote ‘no,’ citing last-minute changes to the bill revealed last week. The latest draft no longer addresses bulk unlocking. “We announced at the beginning of this process that we were not going to get into the whole [Section] 1201 of the [Digital Millennium Copyright Act] issue in this bill,” Goodlatte told reporters. “We were simply going to take care of individual cellphone unlocking, and that [change] was simply designed to make it clear that was the case.” Bulk unlocking will be addressed as part of the committee’s broader review of copyright, Goodlatte added. On Tuesday, Reps. Thomas Massie, R-Ky., and Jared Polis, D-Colo., joined the two Californians in opposition. “After this bill was marked up and reported out of committee, a new section was added to the bill without notice to or consultation with us,” said the Dear Colleague letter from the four members. “As a consequence of this late added provision, both the Electronic Frontier Foundation and Public Knowledge have withdrawn support for the bill.” House Judiciary ranking member John Conyers, D-Mich., however, does “support this version of the legislation primarily because there is a critical limitation in the bill that tethers it to the sole purpose of switching carriers to increase consumer and carrier choice,” a Conyers spokesman told us. On Tuesday, Goodlatte circulated his own Dear Colleague letter requesting support for his bill. “Due to concerns over smartphone theft rings, the Fraternal Order of Police supports the current language in H.R. 1123 concerning bulk unlocking,” said the letter, signed by Goodlatte, Conyers and Reps. Jason Chaffetz, R-Utah, Howard Coble, R-N.C., Hakeem Jeffries, D-N.Y., and Jerrold Nadler, D-N.Y.

The Senate Judiciary Committee announced a March 26 hearing to scrutinize the recently announced Comcast/Time Warner Cable acquisition. “The merger of Comcast and Time Warner Cable touches on important policy questions about how Americans access these valuable services,” Chairman Patrick Leahy, D-Vt., said in a statement Monday. “It also presents a critical moment to discuss net neutrality principles that have allowed the Internet to remain an open marketplace for ideas.” Previously, the Senate Judiciary Antitrust Subcommittee had said it would hold a hearing, but Leahy said the full committee should hold the hearing “because these are issues of national importance.” Subcommittee Chairwoman Amy Klobuchar, D-Minn., expects the hearing to examine “the details of the proposed merger and how it will impact competition in the cable and broadband markets,” she said. “Consumers deserve fair prices and high quality service for their TV and internet access.” The hearing will be at 10 a.m. in 226 Dirksen. Witnesses weren’t announced.