California’s social media transparency law, AB-587, “reflects a growing trend of government interference in the private editorial judgments” of businesses that operate on the internet, said the U.S. Chamber of Commerce in an amicus brief Wednesday (docket 24-271) at the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in support of X’s appeal to block California Attorney General Rob Bonta (D) from enforcing it (see 2401160031).

Home security company Vivint failed to disclose to a customer that he would be required to buy additional products to receive its service and refused to allow him to cancel home monitoring, alleged a Jan. 12 fraud class action (docket 1:24-cv-01010) removed Wednesday from Burlington County, New Jersey, Superior Court to U.S. District Court for New Jersey in Camden.

A Tampa doctor’s T-Mobile account was improperly transferred to another individual who used the doctor's identity to attempt to buy fraudulent prescriptions of controlled substances, tried to transfer $100,000 from her retirement account and obtained money via a financial services platform, alleged Pina Panchal's negligence complaint Wednesday (docket 8:24-cv-00456) in U.S. District Court for Middle Florida in Tampa.

Debt collection service IC System continued to inaccurately report late-payment charges on a Charter Communications customer’s account after he disputed the information to credit reporting firms Equifax, Experian and TransUnion, said a complaint Wednesday (docket 6:24-cv-00371) against IC System, Charter and Equifax in U.S. District Court for Middle Florida in Orlando.

Here are Communications Litigation Today's top stories from last week, in case you missed them. Each can be found by searching on its title or by clicking on the hyperlinked reference number.

The 4th U.S. Circuit Appeals Court affirmed a district court jury’s finding of willful contributory copyright infringement against Cox Communications for the piracy actions of some of its 6 million internet customers, but it reversed the jury’s vicarious liability verdict, said a three-judge panel’s published opinion Tuesday (docket 21-1168). Circuit Judge Allison Jones Rushing wrote the opinion, in which Judges Pamela Harris and Henry Floyd joined.

The Media Alliance and Great Public Schools Now seek to intervene in support of the FCC in eight petitions for review of the commission’s Nov. 20 digital discrimination order, now consolidated in the 8th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, said the nonprofits’ unopposed motion Tuesday.

The 9th U.S. Circuit Appeals Court should grant Apple permission to appeal under Rule 23(f) and reverse the class-certification order in an antitrust case vs. the tech company, stemming from a 2011 class action, said Apple’s petition (docket 24-875) for permission to appeal a district court’s Feb. 2 class-certification order.

The Ohio Telecom Association (OTA) petitioned the 6th U.S. Circuit Appeals Court for review of the FCC’s updated data breach notification rules, adopted Dec. 13, released Dec. 21 and published in the Federal Register Feb. 12, said its Tuesday filing (docket 24-3133). The rules are effective March 13.

Petitioners Maurine and Matthew Molak want the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals to “disregard the statutory requirement” under Communications Act Section 405(a) that persons who weren’t parties before the FCC file a petition for reconsideration as a “condition precedent” to seeking judicial review, said the FCC and DOJ reply Friday (docket 23-60641) in support of their motion to dismiss the Molaks’ petition (see 2402070002).