A new U.K. law that could prevent lawyers from providing certain legal services in the context of Russia sanctions is causing uncertainty within the legal industry, law firms said. Baker McKenzie said the legal community is working with U.K. authorities to “clarify the scope of the new sanctions measures,” but “in lieu of any imminent published guidance, businesses should assess” their in-house legal teams, particularly if they’re providing legal advisory services from the U.K.

A Puyallup, Washington, resident who illegally exported optical magnifiers to South Korea agreed to export compliance training as part of a settlement agreement announced by the Bureau of Industry and Security this week. If Jaeyoun Jung doesn’t complete the training, he may be subject to a two-year temporary denial order, BIS said.

The Bureau of Industry and Security could use its existing “catch-all controls” to tighten restrictions around exports of sensitive artificial intelligence models, eliminating the need to develop new regulations to address emerging AI export risks, researchers with Georgetown University's Center for Security and Emerging Technology said this week. The researchers said the catch-all controls -- which allow BIS to restrict exports if there is “knowledge” the item will be used in certain dangerous ways -- may be “sufficient” to “address the use of AI in more traditional national security realms.”

Export Compliance Daily is providing readers with the top stories from last week in case you missed them. You can find any article by searching for the title or by clicking on the hyperlinked reference number.

House lawmakers submitted a host of proposed export control- and sanctions-related amendments as part of the FY 2024 National Defense Authorization Act, including measures that could ease defense technology sharing restrictions, harmonize the Entity List with certain U.S. sanctions and investment restrictions and place new export control requirements on items destined to China and Iran. Other amendments could lead to new sanctions on Chinese technology companies and government officials, add the USDA to the Committee on Foreign Investment in the U.S., establish a new sanctions coordination office in the State Department and more.

A former board member of a Russian state-owned bank asked a federal court to order the U.S. to remove her from a U.S. sanctions list, saying there is “no factual basis” that supports her listing. In a complaint recently filed with the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, Elena Titova, a dual Russian and U.K. citizen, said she resigned from her position eight days after Russia’s invasion of Ukraine last year but was still added to the Treasury Department’s Specially Designated Nationals List even though she hasn’t been designated by any “other nation in the world.”

The Netherlands last week published new export controls over certain advanced semiconductor manufacturing equipment in a step aimed at bringing Dutch policies more closely in line with strict U.S. export licensing requirements against China. The measures, previewed by the government in March (see 2303090032), take effect Sept. 1 and will require exporters to apply for and receive an authorization before shipping a “number of very specific technologies for the development and manufacture of advanced semiconductors.”

Upcoming European rules surrounding artificial intelligence products will have significant supply chain implications for developers and suppliers, lawyers said last week. They also suggested one provision in the law could lead to a surge in EU AI imports before the restrictions take effect.

New potential U.S. export controls on a broader set of artificial intelligence-related chips could have massive impacts on the chip industry and American chipmaker Nvidia, said Colette Kress, Nvidia’s chief financial officer. Kress, speaking about reports that the Biden administration could tighten existing chip export restrictions as it prepares to finalize its China chip export control rule from October, said new license requirements could deal permanent damage to American chip industry sales in China.

The Biden administration is still considering a range of “very technical questions” on its upcoming outbound investment restrictions, which is partly why the rules haven’t yet been released, said Mike Pyle, deputy national security adviser for international economics. He said officials are still working through how to define the types of technologies that would be captured by the program and the types of investments that would be screened, and are still speaking with industry about how to best scope the restrictions.