The U.S. Council for International Business submitted its outline for how to improve the World Trade Organization to the Senate Finance Committee, which held a March 12 hearing on the WTO (see 1903120055). "Our recommendations for modernizing the WTO should not in any way be read as questioning the business support for WTO. Instead, they are intended to highlight areas for action that would strengthen the ability of the organization to more effectively meet the demands of a changing world," the trade group wrote.
Mara Lee
Mara Lee, Senior Editor, is a reporter for International Trade Today and its sister publications Export Compliance Daily and Trade Law Daily. She joined the Warren Communications News staff in early 2018, after covering health policy, Midwestern Congressional delegations, and the Connecticut economy, insurance and manufacturing sectors for the Hartford Courant, the nation’s oldest continuously published newspaper (established 1674). Before arriving in Washington D.C. to cover Congress in 2005, she worked in Ohio, where she witnessed fervent presidential campaigning every four years.
Rep. Bill Pascrell, D-N.J., who was ranking member on the House Ways and Means Trade Subcommittee, and Rep. Rosa DeLauro, D-Conn., a prominent NAFTA foe, are soliciting signatures for a letter they plan to send later this month on the importance of including Mexican labor reforms in a new NAFTA, now called the U.S.-Canada-Mexico Agreement.
With the second round of announcements on Section 301 exclusions (see 1903010029), trade professionals are trying to find patterns of what is granted -- so far, 985 requests -- and what has been denied -- a little over 4,500. About 3,300 requests on hundreds of tariff lines have been tentatively approved by USTR, if CBP says the exclusions are administrable. Nicole Bivens Collinson, who leads the international trade and government relations practice at Sandler Travis, said that if all of those were to go through, about 45 percent of all requests would have been approved.
The AFL-CIO said that it "will have no choice but to oppose" the new NAFTA if the Trump administration insists on a vote on it in its current form, in a lengthy March 14 post on its website. The coalition of labor unions, which has major influence in the Democratic party, made that statement just after saying that Mexico must pass its new labor law before Congress votes. That is also the position of the U.S. government.
The general counsel to the U.S. trade representative said that after five trilateral meetings with the European Union and Japan, the countries have reached "general agreement" on how the World Trade Organization should address subsidies and state-owned enterprises. He said it's not just U.S. blue-collar workers who have grown dissatisfied with globalization, and pointed to the new populist government in Italy, Brexit and the Yellow Vest movement in France.
Rep. Jackie Walorski, R-Ind., said that with an approval rate of just under 6 percent for steel exclusion requests when domestic firms objected, "it really looks like somebody's finger is on the scale." In a sit-down with International Trade Today, Walorski explained how what started with complaints from 10 businesses in her district -- which is heavy with steel-consuming RV manufacturers -- has made her office the place for companies around the country to share their problems with exclusions. "We knew this is probably what was going to happen," she said of the exclusion process that favors domestic producers.
House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer, D-Md., said that while the Democrats have real concerns on how the new NAFTA "will affect trade, how it's going to affect the environment, how it's going to affect prescription drug availability," U.S. Trade Representative Robert Lighthizer has credibility in Congress, and will be listened to. Lighthizer is scheduled to address all Democrats on March 13, the first time he has met with the full caucus.
U.S. Trade Representative Robert Lighthizer heard dozens of questions about the new NAFTA and the fate of Section 232 tariffs on steel and aluminum from about 50 members in the New Democrats caucus, but specifics were few, even as one called it a "good, candid conversation."
When U.S. Trade Representative Robert Lighthizer was asked during his Senate Finance Committee testimony March 12 if the China trade deal might come together by the end of March, he said it remains to be determined. "Well, we’ll see ... I don’t know when something’s going to happen. Something is either going to have a good result or we’re going to have a bad result before too long," he said. "But I’m not setting a specific time frame and it’s not up to me. I’m working as hard as I can, and the president will tell me when the time is up or the Chinese will." He told Sen. Rob Portman, R-Ohio, a former USTR himself, that the Chinese are offering concessions with the goal of getting Section 301 tariffs lifted, and he said that "is under debate."
Senate Finance Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, said that since tariffs on the largest, third tranche of Chinese products are at 10 percent, an exclusion process isn't necessary. He said he agrees with the Office of the U.S. Trade Representative's position that unless that tariff goes up to 25 percent, there won't be exclusions offered.