President Joe Biden said he's "prepared to negotiate" with Republicans on the size and scope of an infrastructure spending package, but "it’s going to get down to what we call infrastructure," as he began a Monday meeting with Senate Commerce Committee Chair Maria Cantwell, D-Wash., ranking member Roger Wicker, R-Miss., and other lawmakers on the subject. Biden told reporters, "I think broadband is infrastructure. It's not just roads, bridges, highways, et cetera." Biden's proposal includes $100 billion for broadband, in line with Democrats' legislation (see 2103310064). Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg also cited the infrastructure definition debate, tweeting, "Why would anyone turn against broadband because it's not a bridge, or come out against water pipes because they're not highways?" Democrats "just spent nearly $2 trillion on a COVID relief package -- the majority of which did not go to immediate pandemic problems," Wicker tweeted after the meeting. "Now, @POTUS has a $2.3 trillion infrastructure proposal, but not even 70% of it could be called infrastructure. Where does the spending end?" Republicans are "wary" about whether Biden's meetings with the party's lawmakers are actually aimed at "working out a bipartisan deal, or if they are about window dressing that will lead to another Democrat-only reconciliation process," a Senate GOP aide said. The White House released fact sheets before the meeting outlining each state's infrastructure needs. For instance, "26% of Mississippians live in areas where, by one definition, there is no broadband infrastructure that provides minimally acceptable speeds," that state's fact sheet said. "And 50.1% of Mississippians live in areas where there is only one such internet provider. Even where infrastructure is available, broadband may be too expensive to be within reach. 23% of Mississippi households do not have an internet subscription. The American Jobs Plan will invest $100 billion to bring universal, reliable, high-speed and affordable coverage to every family in America."
Jimm Phillips
Jimm Phillips, Associate Editor, covers telecommunications policymaking in Congress for Communications Daily. He joined Warren Communications News in 2012 after stints at the Washington Post and the American Independent News Network. Phillips is a Maryland native who graduated from American University. You can follow him on Twitter: @JLPhillipsDC
Public safety communications leaders told us they remain divided on the next-generation 911 language in the Leading Infrastructure for Tomorrow’s (Lift) America Act (HR-1848) as the House Commerce Committee eyes how to proceed on the measure. HR-1848 allocates $15 billion for NG-911, along with $80 billion for broadband deployments (see 2103110060). The National Emergency Number Association and National Association of State 911 Administrators are continuing to press committee Democrats to modify HR-1848 language they view as impinging on existing NG-911 work. APCO continues to back the NG-911 provisions and countered opponents’ claims during a webinar last week.
Some members of Congress are taking a tentative renewed look at legislation to reallocate proceeds from the FCC's recent auction of spectrum from the 3.7-4.2 GHz C band to pay for broadband, before Capitol Hill's debate over infrastructure spending. President Joe Biden proposes $2.3 trillion for infrastructure, including $100 billion for broadband (see 2103310064). Republicans criticized the administration for pursuing corporate tax increases to help pay for it.
President Joe Biden’s infrastructure proposal, which includes $100 billion for broadband (see 2103310064), got attention during a Thursday meeting between administration officials and six community broadband groups, participants told us. ACA Connects, the Competitive Carriers Association, National Rural Electric Cooperative Association, NTCA, Rural Wireless Association and the Wireless ISP Association participated in the meeting, a WISPA spokesperson confirmed. The groups didn’t object to the general plan the White House released Wednesday, but they want to hear more details, the spokesperson said. The meeting was cordial and had been set before the proposal’s release as a “get to know you” introduction of the industry groups. It appears the Biden administration is “still working out the details” and is in a fact-finding mode aimed at making the plan better, said a lobbyist. The White House appeared interested in how to improve the federal government’s collection of broadband coverage data and “boost competition and affordability,” the lobbyist said. Administration officials didn’t appear to have specific proposals on minimum broadband speed requirements. CCA “was pleased to participate in the discussion,” a spokesperson said. The White House and other participating groups didn’t comment. Biden said Thursday he’s designating five Cabinet-level officials to “take special responsibility” to sell his infrastructure plan to the public, including Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg and Commerce Secretary Gina Raimondo. The Fiber Broadband Association praised the proposal Thursday, while the Wireless Infrastructure Association praised its proposed funding for registered apprenticeships. ACA, CTA and TechNet gave mixed assessments based on what they know so far.
President Joe Biden’s administration proposed $100 billion in broadband spending Wednesday as part of the $2 trillion American Jobs Plan infrastructure proposal. That level of spending and Biden’s calls for legislation to improve broadband pricing transparency and affordability mirror Democratic lawmakers' Accessible, Affordable Internet for All Act (HR-1783/S-745) and Leading Infrastructure for Tomorrow’s America Act (HR-1848), as expected (see 2103160001). Reaction to the plan divided along party lines.
Democrats are eager to leverage their newfound unified control of Congress to advance their preferred form of net neutrality legislation, after more than a decade in which conditions in one or both chambers inhibited their path. Some advocates believe lawmakers should move beyond simply codifying FCC-rescinded 2015 rules into statute. Opponents of bringing back those rules believe Democrats’ narrow margins in both chambers preclude them from enacting a measure during this Congress.
Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg backed lawmakers' concerns Thursday about the FCC’s November vote to reallocate 5.9 GHz for Wi-Fi and cellular vehicle-to-everything (see 2011180043). He pointed during a House Infrastructure Committee hearing to coming talks within President Joe Biden's administration about an equitable way to address the issue. Lobbyists we spoke with said they expect a formal interagency review soon.
More industry groups urged the Commerce Department in docket 210113-0009 to delay implementing an interim final rule on securing the information and communications technology and services (ICTS) supply chain. The Information Technology Industry Council previously sought a delay, while Microsoft proposed an alternative (see 2103230062).
Sen. Joe Manchin, D-W.Va., and Rep. Jim Cooper, D-Tenn., led refiling the Eliminate the Digital Divide Act Wednesday. The measure, first filed in October, would allocate $10 billion to states for broadband buildout in unserved areas, including $1 billion for high-cost locations. It would require the FCC update its maps to reflect the 2020 Broadband Deployment Accuracy and Technological Availability Act. Sen. John Cornyn and Rep. Roger Williams, both of Texas, are the measure’s lead GOP co-sponsors. NCTA said the plan “recognizes the importance of tech neutrality and includes important safeguards … to ensure accountability. The legislation also focuses on the need to remove barriers to broadband deployment, such as the [eligible telecom carrier] requirement.” Manchin told reporters he backs an “enormous” infrastructure package that he would like to see lawmakers pay for partly via “adjustments” to tax cuts enacted in 2017. He suggested instituting a value-added tax to help fund an “infrastructure bank.” Some Democrats floated using budget reconciliation without GOP buy-in (see 2103160001).
House Commerce Committee members divided on broadband and next-generation 911 language in Democrats’ Leading Infrastructure for Tomorrow’s (Lift) America Act during Monday's hearing. Republicans indicated they may not support HR-1848 without significant changes. A similar partisan divide was on display last week during a Senate Commerce Committee hearing on federal connectivity programs (see 2103170068).