US, Glycine Petitioner Agree to Dismiss Case Challenging Denial of Scope Ruling Request
The U.S. and domestic producer Deer Park Glycine jointly agreed Sept. 17 to dismiss the producer’s 2024 case against a scope ruling request denial (Deer Park Glycine v. U.S., CIT # 24-00016).
Sign up for a free preview to unlock the rest of this article
Timely, relevant coverage of court proceedings and agency rulings involving tariffs, classification, valuation, origin and antidumping and countervailing duties. Each day, Trade Law Daily subscribers receive a daily headline email, in-depth PDF edition and access to all relevant documents via our trade law source document library and website.
Deer Park Glycine has been challenging the Commerce Department’s refusal to include calcium glycinate, a precursor to dried crystalline glycine, under antidumping duty and countervailing duty orders on dried crystalline glycine from India or China. In two cases, Deer Park challenged both a scope ruling by Commerce that calcium glycine isn’t covered and the department’s refusal to make a second scope ruling that the petitioner requested a few months later (see 2406070069) and (2407240017).
Without prejudice, the parties agreed to dismiss the case challenging the scope request denial.