Trade-Related Court Cases Recently Filed
The following lawsuits were filed recently at the Court of International Trade:
Sign up for a free preview to unlock the rest of this article
Timely, relevant coverage of court proceedings and agency rulings involving tariffs, classification, valuation, origin and antidumping and countervailing duties. Each day, Trade Law Daily subscribers receive a daily headline email, in-depth PDF edition and access to all relevant documents via our trade law source document library and website.
BASF Corporation, challenging CBP's denial of its protest claiming its dry vitamin D3100 GFP HP and dry vitamin D3100 HP, classified under Harmonized Tariff Schedule subheading 2106.90.98 or "other various subheadings," dutiable at 28.8 cents/kg plus a 8.5% ad valorem duty, should be classified under subheading 2936.29.50, free of duty. # 25-00098. Filed June 4.
Abspecialty Silicones LLC, challenging CBP's denial of its protest claiming its various silicone compounds of Harmonized Tariff Schedule subheading 2931.90.9010, subject to 25% Section 301 duties, should be classified under subheading 2931.90.9051 or 3910.00.0000, dutiable at 3%. # 25-00099. Filed June 4.
Appeals of CIT Decisions
The following appeals of Court of International Trade decisions were filed at the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit:
Mitsubishi Power Americas, Inc., appealing an April CIT decision classifying Mitsubishi catalyst blocks under Harmonized Tariff Schedule heading 8421 and not as "other" catalytic reactors under heading 3815. # 25-1828. Opened June 3.