Cox: Music Labels Cannot Deny a Circuit Split Over Piracy Liability
The U.S. Supreme Court should resolve circuit court confusion about how contributory liability applies to the internet "before it is too late," petitioner Cox Communications said in a reply brief Monday (docket 24-171). Cox is seeking SCOTUS review of a…
Sign up for a free preview to unlock the rest of this article
Timely, relevant coverage of court proceedings and agency rulings involving tariffs, classification, valuation, origin and antidumping and countervailing duties. Each day, Trade Law Daily subscribers receive a daily headline email, in-depth PDF edition and access to all relevant documents via our trade law source document library and website.
4th U.S. Circuit decision upholding a jury's $1 billion verdict of willful contributor copyright infringement against Cox for piracy by some of its internet subscribers (see 2408160034). In its reply brief, Cox also urged SCOTUS to rule that internet service providers "are not required to police everything that happens online." Cox said the music label respondents don't deny there are circuit splits. It disputed the appellant music labels' argument of hypocrisy. Cox acknowledged it stops providing services for nonpayment, but that "does not justify forcing every ISP to conduct mass internet evictions for infractions worth, on average, $1 each." The music labels are petitioners and Cox the appellant in a related cert petition. It concerns a circuit court split over how a defendant must benefit from direct copyright infringement to be vicariously liable (docket 24-181) (see [Ref:2409170001).