VoIP-Pal Files Antitrust Suit Over Unbundled Wi-Fi Calling
After years of patent infringement fights, VoIP-Pal is shifting to a legal focus on antitrust complaints, CEO Emil Malak wrote Tuesday. Patent litigation is "a lengthy and uncertain process," while antitrust "offers a more streamlined and direct approach." The company…
Sign up for a free preview to unlock the rest of this article
Timely, relevant coverage of court proceedings and agency rulings involving tariffs, classification, valuation, origin and antidumping and countervailing duties. Each day, Trade Law Daily subscribers receive a daily headline email, in-depth PDF edition and access to all relevant documents via our trade law source document library and website.
last week dropped a complaint filed in August against AT&T and Verizon in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia (docket 1:24-cv-02395) and on the same day filed with the same court a complaint against AT&T, Verizon, T-Mobile and Deutsche Telekom. In that complaint (docket 1:2024-cv-03051), VoIP-Pal said the defendants use their marketplace dominance to hurt competition. In addition, it said they violated Section 251 of the Telecommunications Act by deliberately withholding unbundled Voice over Wi-Fi calling and texting from consumers. Moreover, the carriers "maintained an unfair monopoly" by using VoIP-Pal routing classification technology without authorization.