US, Plaintiff Ask to Reopen Discovery in Case Regarding Classification of Chemical Products
The U.S. and a seller of a chemical product used in the making of plastic asked the Court of International Trade to grant a consent motion to reopen discovery until Nov. 4, saying all expert reports, if any, were to be filed by then (Lanxess Corporation v. U.S., CIT # 23-00073).
Sign up for a free preview to unlock the rest of this article
Timely, relevant coverage of court proceedings and agency rulings involving tariffs, classification, valuation, origin and antidumping and countervailing duties. Each day, Trade Law Daily subscribers receive a daily headline email, in-depth PDF edition and access to all relevant documents via our trade law source document library and website.
Lanxess said in its 2023 complaint that its product should “clearly” be classified as a “supported catalyst” under the duty-free Harmonized Tariff Schedule heading 3815.19, which covers “Reaction initiators, reaction accelerators and catalytic preparations, not elsewhere specified or included: Supported catalysts: Other,” not within heading 3208, which is for synthetic paints and varnishes at a 3.2% duty.
Its product, AXION CA 1330, is not a paint or a varnish, it said. Rather, it is “an organometallic used as a catalyst,” containing “a mixture of molecules consisting of aluminum, oxygen, carbon, and hydrogen in a toluene solvent.” The product is “used exclusively to accelerate certain chemical processes,” it said.