Petitioner, Importer Seek to Intervene in Propane Cylinder Case
Worthington Industries, a domestic producer, was granted permission by the court to intervene as a defendant in a case regarding the antidumping duty review on steel propane cylinders from Thailand (Sahamitr Pressure Container v. U.S., CIT # 24-00064).
Sign up for a free preview to unlock the rest of this article
Timely, relevant coverage of court proceedings and agency rulings involving tariffs, classification, valuation, origin and antidumping and countervailing duties. Each day, Trade Law Daily subscribers receive a daily headline email, in-depth PDF edition and access to all relevant documents via our trade law source document library and website.
On the same day, Worldwide Distribution, an importer and participant in the review, sought to intervene as plaintiff.
The case was brought by Sahamitr Pressure Container. Sahamitr is challenging the Commerce Department’s reclassification of some of its products outside the scope of an antidumping duty order, as well as its use of the Cohen’s d test in the review (see 2404250022).
Worldwide said it seeks to litigate the same claims brought by Sahamitr. All parties consented to its motion to intervene, it said.