Idaho Resident Sues Healthcare System After PII Theft in March Cyberattack
Kootenai Health failed to comply with industry standards to protect information systems that contain patients’ personally identifiable information (PII) and personal health information (PHI) during an early March data breach, alleged a class action Friday (docket 1:24-cv-00205) in U.S. District Court for Idaho in Boise.
Sign up for a free preview to unlock the rest of this article
Timely, relevant coverage of court proceedings and agency rulings involving tariffs, classification, valuation, origin and antidumping and countervailing duties. Each day, Trade Law Daily subscribers receive a daily headline email, in-depth PDF edition and access to all relevant documents via our trade law source document library and website.
Plaintiff Sonna Griffiths, an Idaho resident, was required to provide her PII and PHI as a condition of receiving medical service at Kootenai Health, said the complaint. Griffiths is careful about sharing her private information and stores documents containing her PII and PHI in a safe and secure location, it said. She has never knowingly transmitted unencrypted private information over the internet or another unsecured source and isn’t aware of having been part of a data breach involving her PII or PHI, it said.
As a result of Kootenai’s data breach, Griffiths is concerned that her PII and PHI have been exposed to “bad actors,” the complaint said. Since the breach, she has taken steps to avoid identity theft, including closing some accounts, checking her credit monitoring service, setting up notices and reports, and carefully reviewing all her accounts, the complaint said.
Kootenai’s April 3 press statement said the company had “no evidence that any information has been misused,” the complaint said. The healthcare company was performing a “comprehensive review” of the cyberattack and would reach out to victims with more information when the review is complete, it said.
Griffiths has suffered actual injury from having her private information compromised in the data breach, including damage to and diminution in the value of her private information, violation of her privacy rights and “present, imminent and impending injury arising from the increased risk of identity theft and fraud,” the complaint said. She expects to spend “considerable time and money” going forward trying to mitigate and address harms caused by the data breach; she will be at increased risk of identity theft and fraud “for years to come,” it said.
Griffiths asserts claims of negligence and negligence per se, breach of implied contract and fiduciary duty, and unjust enrichment, and she seeks injunctive and declaratory relief, the complaint said. She also seeks an order requiring Kootenai Health to stop engaging in the wrongful conduct complained of and to use appropriate cybersecurity methods and policies regarding PII and PHI collection, storage, and protection. Griffiths requests awards of damages, attorneys’ fees, legal costs and prejudgment interest.