Trade Law Daily is a Warren News publication.

Simington Says U.S. Can Do More to Counter Chinese Threat

The U.S. “has done a great job of limiting the presence of Chinese telecom equipment domestically, but that’s only the tip of the iceberg” and “there’s still a great deal that must be done both domestically and internationally,” FCC Commissioner…

Sign up for a free preview to unlock the rest of this article

Timely, relevant coverage of court proceedings and agency rulings involving tariffs, classification, valuation, origin and antidumping and countervailing duties. Each day, Trade Law Daily subscribers receive a daily headline email, in-depth PDF edition and access to all relevant documents via our trade law source document library and website.

Nathan Simington said Thursday during a Hudson Institute webinar. He is seeking recognition that Chinese technology that’s not considered telecom equipment still “poses a substantial risk when it’s included as a component of a larger cyber and telecom ecosystem.” The U.S. must go deeper than communications equipment and focus also on AI, automated systems and the “cyber environments” for pipelines, manufacturing plants and vehicular controls, he said. Chinese telecom “poses a threat to the private sector as well,” Simington said. “We have to remain at the forefront of telecommunications and its integration into technologies,” he said. The FCC issues licenses for undersea cables but can’t issue or revoke a license without State Department approval, he said. The U.S. “has taken significant steps to limit the use of Chinese-built undersea cables,” but China’s HMN Technologies still supplies more than 10% of cable infrastructure worldwide, he said. China lays less undersea cable than the U.S., France and Japan, “but not an insignificant amount -- and increasing,” he said. Starting in 2022, the U.S. government “exerted influence” to prevent some new cables from connecting directly between the U.S. and China, he said: “This has led to a quiet cable-laying rivalry between Southeast Asia [and] all the way into the Middle East and Western Europe.”