Importer Moves to Consolidate Incontinence Apparel Classification Cases
The Court of International Trade should consolidate two classification cases concerning imported incontinence apparel, medical textile contractor Viecura told the court in a March 23 motion. Consolidation would "promote a speedy, just, and inexpensive resolution of cases" and is preferable to the designation of a test case because "the sole issue in these two cases is the same," Viecura said. It also would prevent the need to litigate two cases, while the court resolves the sole issue, Viecura said (Viecura v. U.S., CIT #s 21-00154, -00546).
Sign up for a free preview to unlock the rest of this article
Timely, relevant coverage of court proceedings and agency rulings involving tariffs, classification, valuation, origin and antidumping and countervailing duties. Each day, Trade Law Daily subscribers receive a daily headline email, in-depth PDF edition and access to all relevant documents via our trade law source document library and website.
In both cases, garments imported by Viecura were liquidated under Harmonized Tariff Schedule subheading 6108.22.9020 as “Women's or girls' slips, petticoats, briefs, panties, night dresses, pajamas, negligees, bathrobes, dressing gowns and similar articles, knitted or crocheted...;” with a duty rate of 15.6% plus a Section 301 duty of 7.5%. Viecura protested the liquidations, asserting the goods should have been classified under the duty-free subheading 9817.00.96, as “Articles specially designed or adapted for the use or benefit of the blind or other physically or mentally handicapped person.”
CBP denied the protests in 2021 and Viecura sued. Both cases have been idle for over a year.