ATSC 3.0 FNPRM on 'Substantially Similar' Sunset Approved
The FCC unanimously approved a Further NPRM Tuesday seeking comment on all aspects of ATSC 3.0, including the possible sunset of the substantially similar requirement, and whether 3.0-essential patents are being licensed on fair, reasonable and nondiscriminatory terms. The NPRM…
Sign up for a free preview to unlock the rest of this article
Timely, relevant coverage of court proceedings and agency rulings involving tariffs, classification, valuation, origin and antidumping and countervailing duties. Each day, Trade Law Daily subscribers receive a daily headline email, in-depth PDF edition and access to all relevant documents via our trade law source document library and website.
also seeks comment on the availability of 3.0 devices to consumers. “While broadcasters have incentives to provide the programming their viewers want, after making significant investments in ATSC 3.0 technology they may also have incentives to favor their ATSC 3.0 offerings,” said the NPRM. As expected (see 2205310047), the item is broad and doesn’t appear to contain tentative conclusions but seeks comment on the proliferation of 3.0, MVPD carriage, whether the ATSC A/322 standard should be allowed to sunset, and whether broadcasters have begun offering the high-quality viewer experiences 3.0 was supposed to provide. “Without the substantially similar rule, how can the Commission ensure that 1.0 viewers are able to keep watching the same programming they watch today, as well as any new programming offerings on a broadcaster’s primary channel?” asks the NPRM. The item also seeks comment on how long the transition is expected to take, and asks about the availability of cheaper converters. “We are not aware of any low-cost set-top boxes or converters (e.g., external tuners or dongles), or any converter devices that can be purchased offline in a ‘brick and mortar’ location,” said the FNPRM. Comments will be due 30 days after it's published in the Federal Register.