East St. Louis Fighting Dismissal of Streaming Service Franchise Fees Suit
The “public Internet” exception in Illinois' Cable and Video Competition Law, which exempts ISPs, doesn't apply to streaming services since their sole offering is video programming, East St. Louis said Tuesday in an opposition to streamers seeking dismissal of the…
Sign up for a free preview to unlock the rest of this article
Timely, relevant coverage of court proceedings and agency rulings involving tariffs, classification, valuation, origin and antidumping and countervailing duties. Each day, Trade Law Daily subscribers receive a daily headline email, in-depth PDF edition and access to all relevant documents via our trade law source document library and website.
city's franchise fees litigation. In the docket 3:21-cv-00561 opposition filed with the U.S. District Court in East St. Louis, the city said the streaming defendants can't reasonably dispute they use public rights of ways, because without them they couldn't deliver video programming. It said the fee isn't a tax and thus doesn't violate the Internet Tax Freedom Act. Counsel for defendants Netflix, Disney, Apple, Hulu, WarnerMedia, Amazon, CBS Interactive, YouTube, Curiosity Stream, Peacock, DirecTV and Dish Network didn't comment. The city is one of an array of localities pursuing franchise fees litigation against streaming services (see 2112230003).