‘Procedural Burden’ Looms as 2 Tariff Lists Set to Expire 7 Weeks Apart
The Office of the U.S. Trade Representative is wading into “unchartered waters” if it tries extending the lists 1 and 2 Section 301 tariffs on China past their four-year expiration deadlines under the 1974 Trade Act (see 2203140004), David Olave, a Sandler Travis associate and trade policy adviser, said in an email. List 1 is due to expire July 6, List 2 only seven weeks later on Aug. 23.
Sign up for a free preview to unlock the rest of this article
Timely, relevant coverage of court proceedings and agency rulings involving tariffs, classification, valuation, origin and antidumping and countervailing duties. Each day, Trade Law Daily subscribers receive a daily headline email, in-depth PDF edition and access to all relevant documents via our trade law source document library and website.
The Trade Act binds USTR to hold a notice-and-comment review period in the last 60 days before each tranche expires if the agency gets written requests from “domestic beneficiaries” to extend the tariffs, Olave said March 22: “We know what the statute says, but we do not have regulations or precedent to rely upon on how to read the statute.”
It’s possible that USTR “could consider the 301 Actions for Lists 1 and 2 as part of the same investigation,” he said. “The original move by USTR approved tariffs for up to $50 billion, so the two lists are in fact linked to that first scope of action. Therefore, USTR could consider tackling both lists at the same time with regards to comments.”
USTR alternatively could try splitting the lists into “two separate tranches and ask for comments on List 1 first and then List 2,” Olave said. “I do not see major legal reasons against doing that, only the overall procedural burden of dealing with two separate and similar issues almost parallel to one another,” he said. “We’ll see what USTR’s next step is soon.” USTR didn’t respond to questions.