W.Va. Senate Panel Keeps Maps in Broadband Bill
A West Virginia Senate panel considered but decided against removing mapping requirements from a bill meant to increase state control of broadband deployment as federal dollars roll in. At a livestreamed Wednesday meeting, the Economic Development Committee unanimously approved the…
Sign up for a free preview to unlock the rest of this article
Timely, relevant coverage of court proceedings and agency rulings involving tariffs, classification, valuation, origin and antidumping and countervailing duties. Each day, Trade Law Daily subscribers receive a daily headline email, in-depth PDF edition and access to all relevant documents via our trade law source document library and website.
House-passed HB-4001, sending the bill to the Finance Committee. Sen. Eric Tarr (R) proposed amendments, including to remove requirements to map poles and right-of-way disturbances, after Economic Development Department officials testified they could cost $2 million and would duplicate existing work. Tarr said he was wary of "potentially creating some overregulation that could decrease the speed of deployment” and add unnecessary cost. But Tarr withdrew his amendment after HB-4001 sponsor Del. Daniel Linville (R), showed up late to the meeting to defend his bill. Linville said a recent Facebook fiber project in West Virginia faced hurdles because the National Historic Preservation Act required proof of prior disturbance. Mapping disturbances could expedite future projects, he said. Mapping poles would reduce cost and hassle while speeding deployment because the maps would provide ready information on poles’ ability to support attachments, he said. Tarr also proposed and withdrew an amendment to remove the attorney general from the bill, which would leave the West Virginia Public Service Commission in charge. PSC Chairman Charlotte Lane said the commission was well-equipped to handle all parts of the bill that currently includes both the AG and PSC. But Linville said the AG receives many consumer complaints and in 2015 reached a $160 million settlement with Frontier Communications (see 1512100036).