Smart Chip Policies Needed to Reduce Supply Chain's ‘Vulnerabilities’: SIA
The U.S. should adopt “smart policies” to eliminate or reduce “vulnerabilities” in the global semiconductor supply chain “and enhance the U.S. economy, national security, and supply chain resilience,” the Semiconductor Industry Association told the Commerce Department’s Bureau of Industry and…
Sign up for a free preview to unlock the rest of this article
Timely, relevant coverage of court proceedings and agency rulings involving tariffs, classification, valuation, origin and antidumping and countervailing duties. Each day, Trade Law Daily subscribers receive a daily headline email, in-depth PDF edition and access to all relevant documents via our trade law source document library and website.
Security. Comments due Monday in docket BIS-2021-0011 will help shape recommendations to the White House on President Joe Biden’s Feb. 24 executive order to relieve supply chain bottlenecks (see 2103110054). Though “geographic specialization” in semiconductor production “served the industry and its consumers well, it has also created potential vulnerabilities in the global value chain,” said SIA. The industry features more than 50 “points” across the value chain “where one region holds more than 65% of the global market share,” it said. About three-quarters of global chip manufacturing capacity is concentrated in China and East Asia, “a region significantly exposed to high seismic activity and geopolitical tensions and lack of fresh water and power,” it said: Virtually all the world’s “highly advanced” semiconductor manufacturing capacity is based in Taiwan (92%) and South Korea (8%). The global value chain features “single points of failure” susceptible to “natural disasters, infrastructure shutdowns, or geopolitical conflicts and may cause large-scale interruptions in the supply of essential chips,” said SIA. “Geopolitical tensions may result in trade restrictions that impair access to crucial providers of essential technology, unique raw materials, tools, and products that are clustered in certain countries.” The association fears those restrictions could result “in a significant loss of scale and compromising the industry’s ability to sustain the current levels of R&D and capital intensity needed to maintain the current pace of innovation.” The smart policies the U.S. government will need to deploy to mitigate the multiple vulnerabilities should include “targeted investments to fill high-risk gaps,” plus collaborating with “allies and partners globally to strengthen supply chains,” said SIA. “The semiconductor industry needs targeted government policies and incentives.” The U.S. government should work through existing “multilateral and plurilateral forums,” including the World Trade Organization and the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, “to coordinate key semiconductor supply-chain related issues,” it said: Supply-chain resilience, cybersecurity, joint R&D, export controls, intellectual property protection, subsidies and market access barriers should top the list of priorities. SIA urged a U.S. goal of achieving “a more diversified geographical footprint by building additional semiconductor and unique raw material manufacturing capacity in the U.S. and expanding the production sites and domestic sources of supply for unique and critical materials.”