Industry, California Say Feb. 23 Net Neutrality Argument Must Go On
Dismissing DOJ’s lawsuit against California’s net neutrality law (SB-822) doesn’t require postponing a Feb. 23 hearing on a pending preliminary injunction motion by ISP associations, said industry plaintiffs and California in a Tuesday joint status report (in Pacer). The court…
Sign up for a free preview to unlock the rest of this article
Timely, relevant coverage of court proceedings and agency rulings involving tariffs, classification, valuation, origin and antidumping and countervailing duties. Each day, Trade Law Daily subscribers receive a daily headline email, in-depth PDF edition and access to all relevant documents via our trade law source document library and website.
asked last week how DOJ's withdrawal affected the case (see 2102090053). California’s position is DOJ’s exit “underscores Defendant’s arguments that SB 822 is not preempted” because “there is no currently operative statement” suggesting that from the FCC or U.S., said the report in case 2:18-cv-02684 at U.S. District Court in the Eastern District of California. But plaintiffs say it has “no bearing on Plaintiffs’ claims that SB 822 violates the Supremacy Clause,” it said.