Canada Says Retaliation Options Available if Section 232 Tariffs Return on Aluminum
In testimony in Canada's House of Commons, former government chief negotiator Steve Verheul told politicians that there is no surge in Canadian aluminum exports to the U.S., so a return to 10% tariffs on Canadian exports is not warranted. He said the product mix shifted, but the total exports are not up.
Sign up for a free preview to unlock the rest of this article
Timely, relevant coverage of court proceedings and agency rulings involving tariffs, classification, valuation, origin and antidumping and countervailing duties. Each day, Trade Law Daily subscribers receive a daily headline email, in-depth PDF edition and access to all relevant documents via our trade law source document library and website.
The Canadian Press reported that he told the trade committee members July 9 that Canada may retaliate on any “aluminum containing products” if the U.S. brings back Section 232 tariffs. “That's a very broad category,” he said. But what Canada should do will depend on what the U.S. does.
U.S. Trade Representative Robert Lighthizer testified to Congress that his office is consulting with Canada over a surge. Top House Democrats on the Ways and Means Committee said they didn't want to see tariffs return on Canadian aluminum (see 2006250048). But Senate Finance Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, said that if USTR doesn't get satisfaction, he would be OK with a return of aluminum tariffs (see 2006300036).