T-Mobile's Revised Application to Buy Sprint Not Good Enough, Say California Foes
T-Mobile/Sprint opponents in California protested an amended joint application filed last month (see 1909200033). It lacks detail on new elements, preventing the California Public Utilities Commission from ensuring it will be in consumers' interest, said the CPUC Public Advocates Office,…
Sign up for a free preview to unlock the rest of this article
Timely, relevant coverage of court proceedings and agency rulings involving tariffs, classification, valuation, origin and antidumping and countervailing duties. Each day, Trade Law Daily subscribers receive a daily headline email, in-depth PDF edition and access to all relevant documents via our trade law source document library and website.
Communications Workers of America, The Utility Reform Network and Greenlining Institute in docket A.18-07-011 Wednesday. “The Amended Application contains limited or incomplete information and does not fully explain the effect of the Asset Purchase Agreement on California-specific commitments.” A preconference hearing was to have occurred Thursday (see 1909260046). T-Mobile and Sprint didn’t comment.