DC Circuit Upholds Much of Title I FCC Order; Dissenter Disagrees on Pre-emption
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit upheld much of the FCC reclassifying broadband service as a Title I Communications Act information service, with some exceptions including on pre-emption for states' own regulations. The ruling also included a partial dissent from Judge Stephen Williams and concurring opinions from Patricia Millett and Robert Wilkins. Our earlier bulletin incorrectly described the FCC's newest rules as on Title II.
Sign up for a free preview to unlock the rest of this article
Timely, relevant coverage of court proceedings and agency rulings involving tariffs, classification, valuation, origin and antidumping and countervailing duties. Each day, Trade Law Daily subscribers receive a daily headline email, in-depth PDF edition and access to all relevant documents via our trade law source document library and website.
Williams' dissent focused on the pre-emption issue. "The majority conspicuously never offers an explanation of how a state regulation could ever conflict with the federal white space to which its reasoning consigns broadband," he wrote. The ruling is in Pacer.
"Today’s D.C. Circuit decision is a big victory for consumers! The court affirmed the @FCC’s decision to repeal 1930s utility-style regulation of the Internet," tweeted FCC Chairman Ajit Pai. "A free and open Internet is what we have today. A free and open Internet is what we’ll continue to have going forward."
Commissioner Jessica Rosenworcel had a different take. "The court sends back to the @FCC much of the mess it made with #NetNeutrality," she tweeted. "The @FCC was on the wrong side of the American people and the wrong side of history. Let's keep up the fight."