Article 52 Partial Pre-Emption Perhaps Unnecessary, Incompas Says
Partial pre-emption of San Francisco Police Code Article 52 may not be necessary, with Incompas unaware of any provider that shares in-use wiring, it told aides to FCC Chairman Ajit Pai and to Commissioners Mike O'Rielly and Geoffrey Starks, said…
Sign up for a free preview to unlock the rest of this article
Timely, relevant coverage of court proceedings and agency rulings involving tariffs, classification, valuation, origin and antidumping and countervailing duties. Each day, Trade Law Daily subscribers receive a daily headline email, in-depth PDF edition and access to all relevant documents via our trade law source document library and website.
a docket 17-142 ex parte posting Tuesday. It said the partial pre-emption declaratory ruling on July 10's agenda (see 1906190067) could deter other cities and local governments from mandatory access laws, and the FCC shouldn't expand the scope of the draft declaratory ruling to pre-empt other aspects of Article 52 such as mandatory access provisions. It said incumbent service providers and landlords have used revenue sharing and wiring and rooftop exclusivity arrangements as end runs around access rules and to keep competitive providers out of multiple tenant environments.