Second NC Lawmaker Backs Cree's Call to Remove LEDs From Tariffs List
A second U.S. House member from North Carolina went to bat for Cree’s attempt (see 1806110033) to fend off Trade Act Section 301 tariffs on U.S. imports of LEDs from China. The company produces LED wafers at its plant in…
Sign up for a free preview to unlock the rest of this article
Timely, relevant coverage of court proceedings and agency rulings involving tariffs, classification, valuation, origin and antidumping and countervailing duties. Each day, Trade Law Daily subscribers receive a daily headline email, in-depth PDF edition and access to all relevant documents via our trade law source document library and website.
Durham, North Carolina, exports them to China for making them into finished packaged chips and re-imports those chips to the U.S., said David Price (D) in a June 8 letter to U.S. Trade Representative Robert Lighthizer posted Wednesday in docket USTR-2018-0005. Cree would be forced to pay 25 percent higher duties on the devices, “despite the fact that approximately 70 percent of the value of these LED chips and components" is based on U.S. IP, Price said.