Lifeline Group Urges FCC Not to Implement Scheduled Minimum Service Changes
Lifeline providers pressed the FCC to act on their petition to reconsider looming minimum service standard changes for eligible telecom carriers (ETCs) receiving subsidies in the USF low-income support program. Upcoming increases in FCC-prescribed "family-sized portions of voice and broadband…
Sign up for a free preview to unlock the rest of this article
Timely, relevant coverage of court proceedings and agency rulings involving tariffs, classification, valuation, origin and antidumping and countervailing duties. Each day, Trade Law Daily subscribers receive a daily headline email, in-depth PDF edition and access to all relevant documents via our trade law source document library and website.
services" threaten ETC ability "to make critical Lifeline services affordable for consumers, regardless of the size of their household," said the Lifeline Connects Coalition in a filing posted Tuesday in docket 09-197 on a meeting with an aide to Commissioner Mignon Clyburn. The LCC suggested consumers "would be best served by leaving the December 2016 quantitative minimum service standards in place and letting consumers -- rather than regulators -- choose from competing ETCs for the services that best suit their needs." The LCC asked for streamlined FCC review of all Lifeline matters, given "a perpetual logjam of undecided applications for review and ETC designations, compliance plans and other transaction-related approvals" that created a "morose" climate of regulatory uncertainty threatening provider health. The coalition -- American Broadband & Telecommunications, Blue Jay Wireless, iWireless and Telrite -- said implementing "rolling recertification" should be delayed so recon issues can be considered and a national verifier implemented.