Satellite Industry Brings List of Part 25 Proposed Changes to IB
Small satellites pose their own regulatory issues and should be handled separately from the FCC's current look at changes to the Part 25 rules for earth and space station licensing, the Satellite Industry Association said in an ex parte filing…
Sign up for a free preview to unlock the rest of this article
Timely, relevant coverage of court proceedings and agency rulings involving tariffs, classification, valuation, origin and antidumping and countervailing duties. Each day, Trade Law Daily subscribers receive a daily headline email, in-depth PDF edition and access to all relevant documents via our trade law source document library and website.
posted Tuesday in docket 12-267. SIA said it is considering filing a petition for rulemaking specifically regarding small satellites. A parade of satellite industry representatives met with International Bureau staff to lay out industry proposals for Part 25 changes, the filing said. Present at the meeting were executives from or representatives of Boeing, DirecTV, EchoStar, Inmarsat, Intelsat, Iridium, Kymeta, OneWeb, O3b and SES, said SIA, which said the satellite industry "urged the Commission to move expeditiously" on an order. Among the industry-proposed changes are the recommendation the FCC should go further in its proposal that it file with the ITU an operator proposal for a geostationary satellite (GSO) for non-planned fixed satellite service (FSS) bands before a full space station application needs to be filed, SIA said. The FCC should allow ITU filings before license applications for non-geostationary (NGSO) operations in non-planned FSS bands as well as for GSO and NGSO operations in bands outside of FSS, SIA said. Current ITU filing practices put domestic applicants at a competitive disadvantage as they must disclose detailed space station plans before the FCC will file with the ITU, meaning operators have a disincentive to obtain U.S. licensing of new satellite systems, SIA said. The SIA group also told IB staff some technical rules "could be simplified, and in some cases relaxed" to help get products to market faster, though the changes would not materially increase the risk of interference.