Sinclair Lacks Standing to Challenge Auction Order Repacking Deadline, FCC Says

Sinclair and NAB’s petition for review against the incentive auction order. The congressional requirement that the FCC use the OET-69 methodology is not violated by the commission’s plan to use TVStudy, the FCC said in response to NAB. “Software and data are not methodology,” the agency said. The commission also responded to NAB’s argument that the order violated its legislative mandate by failing to preserve broadcast contours. The order preserves the coverage area and populations served of repacked stations by trying to ensure that a station's signals after the auction will reach “substantially the same geographic area at the same signal strength” and the same viewers as it did before, the FCC said. Sinclair, separate from NAB, challenged the FCC’s 39-month deadline for stations to cease broadcasting on their old channels after the auction. However, since Sinclair doesn’t yet know if it has stations that will be affected by the repacking, it doesn’t have standing to challenge that aspect of the rule, the FCC said. FCC rules give new licensees 36 months to build a new station, the FCC said. “The modifications that existing stations will have to make to their facilities following the auction are, at worst, no more complicated than those faced by new licensees constructing new stations,” the commission said. The petitions for review should be denied, the FCC said.