The FCC released a public notice (http://bit.ly/1nIKTtt) Tuesday...
The FCC released a public notice (http://bit.ly/1nIKTtt) Tuesday on the aggregate interference cap and the use of proxy channels when preserving coverage area and population served in repacking stations after the incentive auction. Commenters in the auction proceeding had argued…
Sign up for a free preview to unlock the rest of this article
Timely, relevant coverage of court proceedings and agency rulings involving tariffs, classification, valuation, origin and antidumping and countervailing duties. Each day, Trade Law Daily subscribers receive a daily headline email, in-depth PDF edition and access to all relevant documents via our trade law source document library and website.
that an FCC policy in the Auction Order to consider population served during the process of channel reassignment would not protect stations from aggregate interference after the repacking. In the public notice the FCC released an analysis showing that “approximately one percent of all stations in simulated channel reassignments received new interference above a one percent cap, and that the majority of stations received new aggregate interference well below the pairwise interference limit adopted by the Commission,” the PN said. The PN includes “constraint files” to assist interested parties in conducting their own repacking studies. “To generate sufficient data from which to draw meaningful results, Commission staff performed 100 simulations using several variations of the approach we developed for creating simulated sets of stations to be repacked,” the PN said.