Sinclair urged the FCC to reject Buckeye Cablevision’s...
Sinclair urged the FCC to reject Buckeye Cablevision’s claim that Sinclair’s answer to Buckeye’s complaint on retransmission consent is untimely. Buckeye claimed that Sinclair’s answer was due at the FCC no later than March 10, Buckeye said (http://bit.ly/1gP19Ee). Buckeye ignores…
Sign up for a free preview to unlock the rest of this article
Timely, relevant coverage of court proceedings and agency rulings involving tariffs, classification, valuation, origin and antidumping and countervailing duties. Each day, Trade Law Daily subscribers receive a daily headline email, in-depth PDF edition and access to all relevant documents via our trade law source document library and website.
the fact that the proceeding is being treated as a special relief petition by the FCC and appeared in a Feb. 21 public notice, Sinclair said in a limited response filing in docket 14-33 (http://bit.ly/1h3JIkj). FCC rules say comments or oppositions are due within 20 days after the public notice date of filing such a petition, Sinclair said. The due date was March 13, “the very day that Sinclair submitted its Answer to Complaint,” it said.