A media stock analyst thinks the U.S. Solicitor General...
A media stock analyst thinks the U.S. Solicitor General got it wrong on Aereo, when the solicitor general told the Supreme Court Monday (CD March 5 p9) that the service is illegal while Cablevision’s remote-storage DVR (RS-DVR) isn’t. It’s “impossible”…
Sign up for a free preview to unlock the rest of this article
Timely, relevant coverage of court proceedings and agency rulings involving tariffs, classification, valuation, origin and antidumping and countervailing duties. Each day, Trade Law Daily subscribers receive a daily headline email, in-depth PDF edition and access to all relevant documents via our trade law source document library and website.
to reconcile that, wrote Richard Greenfield of BTIG Research in a note to investors Wednesday. “Nothing happens in the Aereo system unless the consumer using the system activates it and tells the system to record and stream the content to them -- as in Cablevision, the copies are clearly made by the consumer.” Excluding the issue of whether Aereo controls the antennas getting the broadcast-TV signal and then streaming it on the service, “from the capture/storage/streaming aspect, the functioning of Cablevision’s RS-DVR, Google Drive and Aereo are indistinguishable,” wrote Greenfield. “We have no doubt Aereo is illegal if Cablevision is overturned, however, if Cablevision’s RS-DVR is legal and online cloud storage services built on the Cablevision RS-DVR are legal, then the storage/streaming aspects of Aereo must be legal.” The 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Cablevision ruled that that RS-DVR service is legal.